to calculate your "friendly" broker edge :
1. Cash needed to win 100$ on some "Touch" bet (let say its 60$ to win a 100)
2. Use the SAME condition for a "No touch" bet ( 57$ to win a 100$)
3 Add both bets and now you must pay 117$ to guarantee a 100$ win. The house edge in this case is...
1. Its easy to double check , payout must add to "zero sum game" (lol). 7% chance means :
When you take this bet 100 times , you will pay 100 times 1$(100$ total)
You will win 7 times , 14.3$ each for a total of 100$.
The sum is zero.
2. The reverse(will NOT happen) payout is (100/93=1.07...
no , the payout is for every 1$ ( the odds in the example above are just 7% if you took the "will happen" bet).
I think it will work with exp>10 , but then one needs more historical data (300 days , 500 ?) and some reference to Stats Vols.
I build this type of calculator when I was following...
You can build your own calculator in Excel , works pretty accurate for exp < than 10 days .
1. Export daily data to excel(last 110 days)
2. insert counter formula to calculate how many days conditions=true ( must use intraday hi-low)
3. Divide 100 by result ( if counter=7 , then pay of =...
I made a simple format for testing ( this or other SPX strategy).
Note : all calcs on the ASK , one should add/deduct spread as needed.
Insert numbers in column "O" only , and double check all ; I did it really fast.
agree on all. Well , I trade stocks only when I expect additional "edge" (which not exists on Index) : spike in vols for 60d position. The results on SPX are just paper , but still looks good. I am not sure if one can make adjustments here ; the only one I see its to buy back one of the short...
OC , did you ever looked at this strategy on SPX :
1. Short 30d ATM straddle
2. Long 60d wings (2% away from ATM)
The results looks very good.
I do it with stocks ( under certain conditions) and I wonder if you ever tryed the same with Index.
yesterday potential RC candidate , IFIN.
While the price action was very disappointing ( only 3.5% , this stock moved 20+ many times before) , position still broke even because of neutral vega. Notice , that long (APR) already at the max loss ; if price will continue to go down , the short...
agree , real profit comes only with large move , but the neutral (or almost ) vega allowed you to participate in potential big price move without risking a lot.
Unless stock tanks big , the "morning after" vols on INFY will definetly break , let's use 27 , then:
APR vega loss = (50-27)*.05=1.15
MAY vega loss=(35-27)*.10=0.80
From here your guess is good as my (price action).
I do 1:1 ratio calls(or puts) only , and only if stock's price is...
I don't think you can go by simple " lot higher" here.
APR vols was at 65 with vega of 3.3 and MAY at 45 with 6.4 , so if tomorrow vols will collapse to low 30 , then APR will lose 1.05 BUT MAY will also lose 90-95 cents. Not exactly vega neutral , but not so bad r/r to take an almost "free"...
btw , GILD did NOT moved a lot in the last five earning's report : -.3 , 2.6 , 0 , -4.6 , 5.1.
You need 6% gain in price from current levels just to break even,
But everything is possible.
Good luck