Search results

  1. J

    The New York Times retracted its smear of Ron Paul

    Speaking of smears, here is a hilarious one: Ron Paul Race Smear Erased? http://www.freemarketnews.com/WorldNews.asp?nid=41822 This source and others add that publications utilized guest writers and editors on a regular basis. Often these guest writers and editors would write a “Ron...
  2. J

    Bhutto murdered in Pakistan.

    Have you ever read the book "Murder In The Name Of God?" Granted it was a Mormon but doesn't Romney claim that Mormons are also Christians?
  3. J

    The New York Times retracted its smear of Ron Paul

    Blaming everything on liberals again. When do you guys learn to take some responsibility? Do conservatives nowadays also have the victim complex? Do you call Fox News liberal media? Do you call Bill Kristol a liberal? He clearly called Ron Paul "anti-American" and "crackpot." <object...
  4. J

    How do you determine existence?

    When will we see a similar critique of the Bible itself coming from rcanfiel? Why is it that they are always quick to question others' beliefs but never allow any question to their own?
  5. J

    Bhutto murdered in Pakistan.

    Even though CNN blamed it on suicide bomber, headlines in India are: Benazir Bhutto shot dead http://in.news.yahoo.com/071227/20/6ox0a.html I wonder why the difference? Could it be that the suicide bomber was merely a coverup for the real assassination?
  6. J

    Mao appears in Spiderman movie

    Mao's picture in Spiderman: Can you find it?
  7. J

    Jokes 2

    Mother: Who are you?!! Wise Man #1 We are three wise men. Mother What? Wise Man #2 We are three wise men. Mother Well what are you doing creeping around a cow shed at 2 O'clock in the morning?? That doesn't sound very wise to me! Wise Man #3 We are astrologers. Wise...
  8. J

    Are Evangelicals the New KKK?

    Secular Europe’s Merits By ROGER COHEN Published: December 13, 2007 ST. ANDREWS, Scotland The cathedral here, on which work began in the 12th century, was once the largest in Scotland, until a mob of reformers bent on eradicating lavish manifestations of “Popery” ransacked the...
  9. J

    Are Evangelicals the New KKK?

    I agree that's what he is saying. In other words, if a religion advocates something he dislikes (how about polygamy), then it's the wrong religion and people are not allowed to believe it. That's called bigotry.
  10. J

    Are Evangelicals the New KKK?

    Here is the quote: In John Adams' words: "We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. ... Our Constitution," he said, "was made for a moral and religious people." Freedom requires religion just as religion requires...
  11. J

    Are Evangelicals the New KKK?

    Huckabee may be a bigot but Romney did this to himself. His "Kennedy speech" was none of the sort. He claimed that religious faith was a central factor in electing presidents. If so, then he should expect others to attack his religion. This is the major difference between Romney's "Kennedy...
  12. J

    Let me tell you a little bit about Ron Paul

    What I want to know is, how the hell did the guitar handle get into the other picture?
  13. J

    Is Bible inerrant

    It's not really a scientific method but have you heard of Ockham’s Razor?
  14. J

    Anyone else distrust Huckabee?

    Yes, it's called National Socialist Party.
  15. J

    Is Bible inerrant

    No, but unicorns don't fossilize. Being unicorns, you know, makes your skeletons melt away as soon as you die.
  16. J

    Is Bible inerrant

    Lol, does the ID camp have any other kind of friends?
  17. J

    Is Bible inerrant

    I have to assume that you are really not understanding, not doing this intentionally. 1. If you don't have a rigid standard to test a hypothesis, then the hypothesis is not testable. I did not assume that you had a standard and was just asking. 2. Data are not standards. A standard should...
  18. J

    Is Bible inerrant

    You are incorrect in stating that scientific proofs are not permitted to be challenged. Quite the contrary. I demanded that only those proofs that can withstand all challenges can be considered acceptible proofs. I also demanded that you present a rigid standard to test "Bible is inerrant"...
  19. J

    Is Bible inerrant

    In other words, you refuse to define a rigid standard a priori. Leaves room to evade. In science, every hypothesis is proposed with some rigid test cases. These are the cases that can unequivocally disprove the hypothesis. If there is wiggle room then the hypothesis is simply untestable...
  20. J

    Let me tell you a little bit about Ron Paul

    It would be much more believable if you had posted the second post only, without the first obvious attempt at rumor mongering. It's an art, you know.
Back
Top