Search results

Thanks for the reply Chuck. My question to you now is - can eSignal create a package specifically for Forex traders who don't want to pay for realtime equities - only Forex - and perhaps index futures ? It seems as though your pricing is focused on selling the eSignal service package...

Cancelled. Too much crap to wade through to get at the meat. Brian Reynolds - the bond guy is outstanding! Unfortunately Tony is excellent but inconsistent - the rest.... ugh.

Looks way overpriced - I don't understand how you can possibly justify $150 plus per month for data and charting for Forex alone? Seems there ought to be some thought given to a level of service aimed at those who concentrate on the major currency pairs, with some options for adding major...

I'm also in the market for the Nison course - to buy, trade, rent - anything. No video to swap but a few gem books. IM with any offers please (after my man above of course)

Thanks Chuck - but what are the costs I asked about?

What is the deal eSignal with Ensign? Can I get an eSignal FOREX feed and Ensign charting from you guys? What is the cost? And how much more to add the eminis if I want? I'm not interested in trade execution - I have a separate trading platform for that. Just want the Ensign charting...

Yes - but you are now required to hire an employee and buy a new television, washer/dryer, and an SUV that gets below 15MPG. :D

all starting to become clear isn't it? This BS tax cut isn't a "tax cut" at all. It's a massive tax shift! Bend over and take it like a good compassionate conservative. BTW AAA- NYS and CA pay for more in taxes to the federal government than they ever see back. By a long long long shot...

Axe you didn't answer *any* of my previous questions to you. And - your suggestion that any tax cut would always benefits the rich more than the poor neglects the obvious option of targeted tax cuts aimed at different income brackets. Your grasp of tax code is so weak I really wonder...

This is the "meat" of your post? That statement is blatantly absurd it really makes me wonder if have any clue whatsoever? So our current tax code is "communistic" in it's reapportionment of wealth? I don't know what planet you live on but somehow we have built the greatest...

No. I explain the numbers that Bush distorts. If you can't recognize the difference between explanation and distortion you're in the wrong business. Or you should be working in finance for WCOM or TYCO. Instead of making your leaps of logic and throwing around polarizing labels like...

AAA - The only ones waging class-warfare are those at the top. I always find it amusing - these transparent Bush tactics to paint the opposition with the very brush they use to whitewash the truth - like disgracefully labeling all those who oppose their dubious arguments for war as...

People who earn $35,000 or less per year DO pay taxes and your suggestion that they don't or that the amount is somehow inconsequential is wrong, sickeningly arrogant and elitist. In fact people who earn that kind of money give a vastly greater percentage of it to the Federal State and Local...

You're not rich enough. Listen - I have cut more 6 figure checks to the IRS than I care to think about. I founded and ran a small company employing as many as 60 people at one point, before selling it to a larger company. I know from taxes and small business. You get no sympathy from me...

99 percent of employers is a highly misleading statistic - it's like saying that 99 percent of all taxpayers are individuals - it means almost nothing. "responsible for 2/3'rds of net new jobs is also misleading - especially when we haven't seen a net increase in new jobs for 2 years now...

The article is replete with specific facts and refutes the Bush plan directly and specifically. Of particular note is the dissection of Bush's constant and insipid mythologizing small business as the great benefactors of our economy - and the direct beneficiaries of the administrations tax cut...

readme The Fabulist Bush's absurd obsession with small business. By Michael Kinsley Posted Thursday, May 15, 2003, at 1:21 PM PT President Bush, of course, is not a junior reporter for the New York Times. So maybe it doesn't matter if he makes up stories and puts them in the...

No - I told you the truth about the real effects of trickle-down economic policy as it has been practiced in this country. And your reply is some absurd knee-jerk hyperbole about taxes? And here you post more snide sarcasm? You'd be a shoe-in for an anchor gig on FoxNews. They like...

If that post is indicative of your grasp of economics it is no wonder you have no tax liability to worry about. :p

After the Reagan revolution and it's disastrous experiment with supply-side economics it took 5 (FIVE) consecutive tax INCREASES and 15 (FIFTEEN) years to balance the federal budget. Supply side economics is simply mortgaging the future for short-term, unsustainable effect.