Search results

^

The thread has served its purpose. If you feel a need to take the discussion to a higher level, you are encouraged to start a new thread. Or if you prefer, I can start a new thread for you, using This Post as the starting point of a new thread.

If you are the OP, you call the shots. State in the first post the purpose and parameter of the thread, and the moderator will keep it on track for you.

hey... it is a marketing thing. there are always people who's got extra money. Anything above utility is extraction.

Have you tried Constant Volume Bar? It might be more readable than 5sec interval charts.

the options data is 30 times the size of the stock data. are you sure you are up to it? what symbols are you interested in? ALL ? ETF only? for $100/month, you can access the Optionetic's data base. (EOD) if you want to build your own... check out the Optionvue software.

You are naive beyond believe. I couldn't care less about your system, or anybody's system for that matter. I deleted your posts because you are sabotaging other people's threads. I will continue to delete one of your posts from my thread for every sabotaging post you make on other...

most software that have t&s also have user set alarms.

A moderator always maintain a neutral stance when moderating.

I reserve the text for more important things. ;-)

Open up QuoteManager, create a symbol, right click on the symbol, choose Import Data.

Depending on what charting software you use. Chances are, more and more software will be multi-core capable. The software I use is MultiCharts. It can distribute my charts over multiple cores. (but each chart is still confined to one CPU. The advantage only prevails if you have more than...

.

for most people, it does not matter... the CPU now a days are powerful enough to handle most day-to-day tasks without problem. Unless you have special needs or requirement, just buy what you can afford. I have a personal preference for quadcore, because my apps can use all the cores...

It was a statement in question form. But don't worry, although Anek does not use AHG version one anymore, he has assured everybody that the system is still a good one. (I think it is up to version 3 now.)

gnome is right... quadcore is so cheap now a days, choosing it over a dualcore is a no brainer.

[/b] Again, you are jumping to a childish conclusion I have no association with. My original question was on which AHG version you found easy to understand. You have answered that. Thank you. I have no good or bad comments about AHG, nor any intention to make comparison with any other...

[/b] you are jumping to a conclusion I did not intend. I am merely asking which version you think is easy to understand? the version that is publicly available, but Anek does not use anymore? or the subsequent versions, which are not available to the public? I don't know Anek, so I can't...

which version? the one that Anek doesn't use anymore?

IB and its chart.