Search results

Speaking of walking contradiction... Did anyone listen to the Gingrich response when all the candidates were asked how their faith would affect them as president? Let's see if I can find it.

That's what makes it a market. :D

IMO, Obama has about a 5-10 point cushion in the polls until the GOP nominee is picked. An average of the polls have Obama-Romney in a statistical tie. If Romney becomes the nominee, he'll automatically jump about 5-10 points as the base coalesces around him. Gingrich is well behind Obama...

I disagree. As things currently stand, I think Obama would lose to Romney or Santorum. Gingrich would be close. Obama would beat Paul. I actually think it will be an improved economy that wins it for Obama toward the end of the year. But right now, he loses.

Natural business cycle mainly. Businesses are flush with cash right now too and running incredibly lean and efficient. In terms of the market, anyone who bets against the market this year is gonna be in for some heartache.

Wow! I really underestimated Romney. I really thought that we were going to see the same old Romney at the debate, saying the same dead lines that everyone has heard many times. Until last night, I was convinced that the only reason Romney did ok in debates was because of an extreme...

I actually think things will be on a noticeably positive trend by year end. Rapid expansion in 2013.

First, I'm not talking about republicans. They were never going to vote for him anyway. I'm talking about more centrist voters. He doesn't appear to be the guy who accomplishes his agenda, he appears incompetent. Secondly, the main focus of the 2008 election was the economy until the war...

Newt made a major mistake. He assumed that moderators don't prepare the way candidates do. Obviously they are going to discuss what went down the other week, and he is going to form a game plan when that happens again. Also, this is Wolf Blitzer we are talking about. He isn't some...

I'll be honest, during Obama's first run during the primaries I was really impressed with many of his statements and his ability to connect with voters. But I always thought that the "great orator" statements were overblown. I generally found him to be very lacking in any ad lib situation. He...

I agree that while Romney is very smart and competent, he isn't great at thinking on his feet, and I think his Mormonism hurts him in one particular way. He is too nice and not willing to really debate in a heartless manner. Yes, Newt could debate better. But there are only three general...

Back on topic.. My prediction is that Newt dominates the debate tonight and edges out Romney in FL because of it. Romney threw his best punches on Monday. Newt is too skilled in the debates to let him do that again tonight. The only thing that Romney can do is call him out on it when...

yeah, I just do my best to try to keep things civilized in here to a certain extent. There can be good discussions, but once the attacks get started, the thread is done.

It was my error. I made an accusation that I shouldn't have made before enough fact checking. I perceived Mav's comment as simply a statement regarding a general condition on ET, not necessarily pointed at you.

Wasn't Coulter anti-Romney a few months back?

NEVER!!!!!! whoah whoah whoah This is partisan politics baby!!

yep, I stand corrected.

Nope, you're right. It was incorrectly quoted in an article. It was Daniels.

Well, I could be mistaken too. The snip that I provided might have been form Daniel's speech.

How could I be mistaken when I just provided you the quote from the SOTU transcript? I realize that Daniels said it also. But I listened to both of them too, and it was first said by Obama in the SOTU. You can't criticize the GOP for a statement and then not criticize your guy for the...