Search results

Revolution will end America. Before, we had one enemy, and she was still healing from the Seven Years war. Her supply chain was very long, her armies were tired. And Washington got lucky. Revolution this time will b another civil war. Foreign powers will take advantage of that to the...

I believed that up until the dems primary last year. I am person who watches an equal amt of MSNBC and Fox. O'Reilly cancels out Olbermann Matthews cancels out Beck Maddow cancels out Hannity I also listen to Rush on the radio. I was tuned in when he suggested as a game to make...

Revolt in Iran, military situations of the high seas with N. Korea. Scylla and Charybdis. Obama is in a very tough spot. We cannot show weakness to either of these foes as it will certainly embolden them. If we board that ship, N. Korea may strike S. Korea. In fact, they must, or Kim...

NeoRio, If that article is what u represent, then my hat is off to u.

If ur over 50, gigs, then u would have to know that the position the party of Rush has taken is untenable. U guys are attacking the man. This is a critical error. Attack the plan, praise the man. That is how u defeat a cult of personality. If u attack the man, ur attacking everyone...

The last paper did define what I would consider a change in trend. Now, the question is, the earth would be a super tanker, rather than a speed boat. Unwinding our CO2 position will be onerous to say the least. Can man reverse the trend b4 a breach?

Very compelling argument, this paper. 2.1 million is a large enough time frame to deal with in geo terms. Thanks for gettin me up to speed TZ. Bigdave, appreciate the civilized debate. Will definitely look more closely at this now.

okay, i will look more closely into it.

I did not use it in that way. I would want to c data that CO2 created by man can be differentiated from CO2 that occurs naturally and that man made CO2 is the cause of present global warming and that it is producing data that would indicate a problem that is reversible by our actions. Has this...

Well, if someone is telling me global warming is man made, but the ROC of the uptrend does not suggest a breach of the prior high, I am going to be skeptical as to whether or not this not a normal occuring circadian rhythm that the planet is having. CO2 is a naturally occuring gas on the...

From what I have seen of the argument, which I will admit is not my expertise, the question is not the temp change, the question is it man made? That would require prediction. I would want to know if this trend is a normal oscillation, and whether or not the rate of acceleration of the trend...

Ad hominem Appeal to Ridicule Appeal to Spite Cmon, bigdave, keep the logical fallacies down:) If ur gonna present an argument that anyone hears, do so without so many logical fallacies. That said, do we have six cycles within that time frame? Less than six full up and down...

http://northcoastinvestmentresearch.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/kondratieff-cycle.jpg

http://www.kwaves.com/kond_overview.htm

Here is something for u econ nerds who also happen to trade to look at after u have tried on that loud tie, and drank coffee from that corny mug u just got! https://faculty.washington.edu/modelski/IPEKWAVE.html

A good cycle analyst requires long count waves, to model data. So I would prefer 6 K-waves worth of data as a minimum for good analysis. Gann turned to modeling astro data, as good stock data does not go back that far. So now were are talking about "geo waves" where one year equals a thousand...

troll: ad hominem You wouldn't the mind of anything: Burden of Proof. Cmon Mav88, u can do better than this deconstucted piece of crap, can't u?

How far back does that data go??? If is less than half the estimated age of the planet, long term cycles cannot be established with any real degree of certainty. Massive problems will be dealt with as they occur, as humans have always done, with great success I might add. The government is...

Wow, u had to dig deeeep to find this one, didn't u?

I haven't read this whole thread, but to draw any kind of reasonable hypothesis, step one is have an adequate data set. In this case, it is impossible. We currently lack the tech. It is hubris to think we can kill a planet. We can only kill ourselves, and the planet may do that for us...