I solved this problem by avoiding stocks with high IV as compared to HV
IMO a better approach because the IV is the market determined risk of FUTURE volatility.
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=197895
I have tried simulating fills with just bid/ask/last/volume data. It holds up pretty well for real trading with 100-share limit orders. Sometimes you get a lucky fill and sometimes you miss out, but overall it evens out.
But for > 100 share orders the simulation falls apart. In real trading...
Good thread ... the market is a bunch of computers looking at each other.
Retail interest will come back .... things will change again .... we will have another 1999 .... someday :cool:
I was playing with the new InifiniDB Windows release this weekend. It doesn't use indexes, so to find a range of data it does a full column scan on one or more "extents" of 8 million rows. InfiniDB does it all in parallel, so it was cool to see all 4 cores running full blast. But even with 4...
mmmm .... that "squiggly line" setup failed 3/3 times during the past years rally.
Not a layup, you need trading skills to make that work. This isn't Wizetrade :D
If you trade at-market HFT gives you a better price .... period, end of story!
If you try to play the limit order game against a computer ... well be prepared to lose (I guess we should outlaw computers??)
Update or disable Java plugin .... regardless of IE/Firefox/Chrome, many computers have been infected the past few months by a new java exploit. Fixed in the lastest version of Java.
Funny that when HFT walked away, there was no bid in the market down to 0.01 on some stocks. Like I've said before in a debt-based economy there's almost no such thing as fundamentals.
When I was a desk jockey, a coworker buddy of mine (working the same job) found that and said "oh, look I am richer than 99.13% of everybody". So naturally I look myself up and said "cool, I am richer than 99.14%"
(awkward silence)