Search results

Are you using some kind of leverage or is this solely on nominal?

I like the lowercase i:s for low earner authenticity.

Looking interesting (less noise), but closed to non-US for now.

As a reminder, China: Has ~540 million public cameras feeding into their AI survelliance systems. Has had leaks showing extensive data sets on one billion of their own people. Has a dystopian social credit system. Requires their nationals by law to spy for the Chinese state if requested. And...

1) One reason to why traders lose is transaction costs. Those can unfortunately not be inverted, unless you start a market making business. 2) "Inverting yourself" in a vacuum as a discretionary trader is patently ridiculous, you're likely to change something. Maybe you could do it by trading...

Oil often displays fade the news price behavior. Although I think going oil is going a bit higher this year, I wouldn't go long for a short term trade here. Disclaimer: I'm not an oil trader.

lol wtf are you on about, news covering this has fronted every newspaper in Sweden of substance (for instance). Meanwhile, the Swedish age of retirement might end up at something closer to 70 by the time I retire.

What's the purpose of the thread? Are you looking for some kind of input? This is a trading forum after all. (And yeah, could be a bot...)

Yeah, sadly it's not very difficult for a scammer to copy the HTML/CSS format of a legit email. So you can't use visuals to ascertain it's legit.

Well, at least you're honest about what it is in the thread title. Martingales feel good for a while then you lose all your money (or maybe if it's an "advanced one", a major loss that eradicates profits anyway). You're not gaining any edge by unconditionally averaging down, just shuffling...

Because he was lucky that a random artillery shell didn't blow him up (also considering all previous engagements he was in) or a particular way a German aimed his rifle would have produced a hit. War is random like hell on the individual level but somebody has to go out there and do the job...

These kinds of stories are neat but one should remember it's a survivorship bias. The story is also how 250 guys managed to lose to 1 guy (haven't watched it yet but I assume based on the title that's how it plays out). :D

I do hope you have another income stream... Otherwise it's mission impossible IMO.

So of course making small RR trades can be an issue, or any kind of small short duration trades that have a high transaction overhead vs price movement. You also need to be in the trade long enough to capture the move you set out to capture. Be aware CFDs are typically more expensive than...

Yeah, presumably it's only net exposure that gets hedged (disregarding details on how to avoid extra roundtrips when e.g. an open to buy follows an open to sell of another customer on a lag).

Any day now, right?

at the moment (not at the money here obviously)

But scientists don't know how to analyze weather I'm constantly told by right wingers denying global warming or its human causation.

My guesses would be as good as random so the 8/15 seems about right. Tried to perform mental linear regression and extrapolate trend, but my view is that just looking at price is dead in the water. It's interesting if ETers in aggregate would have a score <= 6 though, provided enough samples...

I considered that possibility, but it's a bit unusual theme for a spambot. Of course, ChatGPT would easily be able to make something like that linguistically, but it it wouldn't choose a current news topic and instead have been instructed to write something super generic about trading.