Search results

and (8/1) P.S. I do wish people would stop hounding Jack so much :( IHMO, He has given out a wonderful method.

Thanks jem. I do not trade everyday as I am still learning and have other commitments (but I do perform drills everyday as mind building exercises). But when I do, the results confirm my skills are progressing. Spyder recommends one earn 3X their annual income before considering a shift in...

Its workin ok for this 2 car piker newbie :)

PRV = Pro Rata Volume: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1466631&highlight=prv+calculated#post1466631 http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1512850&highlight=esignal+prv#post1512850 Bar Coloring - conditional logic can be found in the following...

I will give that one some thought... I have seen a few typos from Jack (or maybe Dragon 9) and could not be sure if the word was literal :) Fits in nice and simply with the seeds (cases). I have to remind myself not to overthink sometimes :) <img...

I think I just had an AHA! on this one... observing 11:20-11:25 ET [intra-bar] (and others in this area) behavior and T/S. Minority "stirs it up" (price that is) to induce volume required to get over to the right side. If this is the case, I have yet to 'see' how they are performing...

Sounds good to me... Very good :) EDIT: Then we need to change my note: "WMCN for BO" to something like "PT2-PT3 retrace of Final DOM traverse" :D <img src=http://elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=2018375>

I have added some notes of how I viewed the morning after review Spyders comments and debrief. EDIT: I should note also, that where I have written "New PT3 Channel created", On my chart it was actually a CO channel and an FBO as I had it drawn this morning. (Not necessary for the morning...

Ahhhh! Well then that is beautiful how price moved up to it... retraced, (how convienent as a non-dom traverse on the newly forming channel, where have I seen that before) :) then PT3, then BO! Immutable... Nice!! Thanks for clarifying.

Thanks for posting John. Knowing that channels overlap, I was looking for the proper "Forest Level" channel to account for the overlap (your red channel). Just seemed like such pitiful volume (relatively speaking) after that (Red PT3) I left it off. Mistake :) Also, looks like I still...

I wanted to clarify (for anyone grapling with my response) that in light of Spyder's clarification and some debriefing and review, the above statement was incorrect. We had completed the sequence at that time and were in a new dominant traverse.

My view of the day (ES). Thanks again for everyones valuable input today. As Aurum says... Good Stuff!

I still have not wrapped my noggin around sequencing coupled with traverses coupled with channels. But I think I had a big AHA! today (with the aid of your post above and this one). Def need some time to put some peices together. Thanks again for all the guidance.

Would we also anticipate fanning this traverse? As the morning was fanned?

Sorry, I got a little excited there. At the time of your response, Since the Channel sequence has not completed, I was anticipating a non-dom retrace (traverse) on the ES-5M fractal.

Thanks bi9foot! I am not so good at multi tasking :) I have been thinking about this one lately too. OB and how stirrups are the analysis tool Come on guys... Offer up some wisdom on this concept! :D

IHMO, Seems important to qualify this with what fractal is being observed. :)

Actually, I was referring to the 10:50 bar. I just have a heck of a time mapping time to my Ensign platform. I will attempt to answer your question. An increase in slope (rate of change) over 10:45? Signifying Peak Volume

Anyone notice anything currently (HINT. A hot topic recently) :) EDIT: 10:50 ET

Cool Thanks! That is an interesting commentary and was my thinking after reading your comments to Romanus about mentally changing the bar. Of course, I had done no prior analysis. If you would, please let the community know what your findings are and advise. It is a quick change for my...