Search results

Reflections and queries of a mad man

Perfected stated

Very impressive :)

and now for the rest of the story....

It may save you time not to annotate things twice. For example, if you annotate a VE there really isn't a need to also post"ve" under it.

and that's the way I see it :cool:

Got a late start :(

It is really a volume thing

Great! I was concerned that I didn't have a retrace :p Its not enough for me to just annotate correctly, they got to be groovy too :cool:

:eek:

Yes and Yes

IBV = Increasing Black Volume IRV = Increasing Red Volume IV = Increasing Volume LM = Lateral Movement :p

:)

"easier"......sheesh Gaussians having to match their channels have been discussed since the very introduction of Gaussians. It is really all in the Journal :p

Yes, having a gaggle of helpful/ concerned people with a working knowledge of this method that are very willing to share their hard earned information does seem a wee bit harsh and unfair........:confused:

Tobbe, There are numerous discussions of this phenomenon using this exact same phrase throughout the Futures Journal

Pretty much the same story here, thankfully my wife works at the desk next to mine. :D

Tobbe, I should have had my Gaussian peak one bar over (15:20 I think) Always respect the Volume peaks and troughs and never bend the Gaussians to match what you want them to indicate.

:)

Swordsman, With all due respect. I believe, as do others that are farther down the path than I, is that when Spyder makes a statement, the very best course of action is two fold. First (and most critically) is to jettison my own set of beliefs on a particular matter and accept Spyders...