Search results

My last reply experience is from this open source project.

I tired but it is very hard to understand some other people coding without comments especially if the person is trying to make people to buy the commercial version of the open source one. If you have good experience with open source project, welcome to share!

I have these simple comparison and welcome to give any comment: Build own trading system advantage: 1. you would know exactly everything and every step, no per-define stuff that always happens in retail trading system, so the chance to have some definition wrong to have wrong outcome would...

I like to use Java but my name is not j2ee.

then I need to use float[] array because decimal point is necessary.

I have two Java trading system technical questions and hope people with experience can give me suggestion: Background information: I would develop my system with Java and run in either Windows 7 64 bits/ Ubuntu 64 bits. I will eventually connect the live trading version to Interactive Broker...

Does Larry Connors come to ET?

so who is the best trader in ET?

Reliable numbers are not provided to public. Any big corp accounting departments is one of the main department, do you know why? Because that is how they hide/pretend something. I am with a main listed company for long time and I can tell you don't believe in all those data in annual report or...

There is no real insider news provide to public, period.

As I said earlier, FA is useless except you are insider of gov/big corp since you never get the real correct data to do analysis if you are an outsider like normal people. Example, US government really releases the correct employee data? Ho yeah~

Both FA and "TA without backtest or subjective TA" are useless. For FA, if you are not insiders, you never know the real data, no matter government data or corp data because gov and corp almost always release not real data to make public believes what they want the direction to be. There are...

For me, only insiders know how to really use the right data to do the correct fundamental analyst, no matter government insider or big corp insider. TA, only believe the possible objectively tested kind, and after you really backtest it.

I learn most of my current professional trading skill from this master: http://dixcuxx.com/redirect.php?tid=2774&goto=lastpost#lastpost

All I said having link to prove their creditability, where is yours? Both of my PHD Carol and Jones cases are good examples with authority, I don't see your arguments even have an link or serious challenging point at all. For PHD Carol head and shoulder paper, so you think she should...

Here is her updated info: http://people.brandeis.edu/~cosler/ She has a solid CV. What do you mean by more experienced guys do not use TA? This guys over here is too junior for you?: Paul Tudor Jones, the billionaire commodity trader, calls Prechter and Frost's standard text on Elliott "a...

I am not saying every TA work as I mentioned before. There is research paper saying there is evidence showing some TA works as you can see from my research paper reply above, and I suggest people should do their own research to find out their own answer.

You sound like you never read research paper. Here is an important research paper result from Princeton PHD: http://www.newyorkfed.org/research/staff_reports/sr4.html http://www.newyorkfed.org/research/staff_reports/sr4.pdf It shows head and shoulder pattern has some predictive power...

First of all my meaning is much more deep than what you said, and my point was TA can be tested to know it would be useful or not, while you sound not challenging TA should all be not useful. You seem like try to have conflict of your own point.

Welcome to explain your argument with rational reasons instead of just talking without any meaningful words.