Search results

sort of reminds me of the bush-clinton-bush train wreck.

i am just wondering whom Goldman will appoint next?

i repeat, the authors of the bill of rights more than likely did not have satanism in mind when they were constructing protection of religion. can anyone truly argue otherwise. i am not even saying they were right, just that they were much less tolerant of satanism than modern society. it is...

makes sense to me......... there is a double standard. can't have your cake and eat it too.

LOL LOL LOL... tell ya what, let'em have the satanist and witches but just as soon as they come for the buddhist we'll kick their asses.

actually i said it with a smile on my face.......sort of a whatever attitude. emotional outburst...LOL LOL LOL.yeah right. nice try :p

well then hell, lets just throw out the whole damn thing....that's where were headed anyways.

not exactly. i just think it is comical to imagine the authors of the constitution/bill of rights witnessing a debate as to whether we should afford satanism 1st amendment protection.

yes, you are right on the money. i am sure your wiccan friends are good people and probably quite moral. in fact there are different groups out there and some are open about their ties to satanism and some vehemently denounce satanism. but if one traces their roots they will inevitably come...

cauterized??? damn that's gotta hurt. too late:p

did they ax MB ???

i think that most wiccans have been fooled... and i already read the wikipedia bit. if you care to delve a little more into the history of wicca you will see conflicts between what they think wicca is and it's true genesis. btw, they do worship The Horned God and use a variation of the...

well when mr GM worker loses his pension fund, buying a $5 hat at walmart ain't gonna make up for it.

AND IF IT WERE ANY OTHER BELIEF SYSTEM I WOULD NOT HAVE RESPONDED TO HIS POST !!!!!!!! DUHHHHHHHHH !!!!!!!!! but he applied the 1st amendment as to protecting satanism which our founding fathers did not have in mind when they sought religious freedom. the authors of the constitution/1st...

and how was satanism at risk??? according to gekko a mean ole christian judge was violating the first amendment. what didn't occur to GG was what AAA pointed out, i.e. that the founding fathers that sought religious freedom were the same ones burning witches at the stake. so maybe the argument...

of course i recognize the principal....... but then i commented on the dynamic of the specific. i know that is difficult for some so maybe in the future i will keep it on a 3rd grade level. geezzzzzzz what i found humorous was that gg got his panties all bunched up because the priciple he is...

are you guys idiots...THAT IS MY DAMN POINT.

no.......wicca is the "religion" at risk in the first post that gets GG all bent out of shape.

while you're at it put me on this list too !!!!!!

if it were not so sad it would be funny. gekko gets his panties all bunched up because satanism is at risk.