Search results

Not anymore. http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/law/04/02/walmart.decision/index.html JB

I think you should re-read both my quote and the article. Neither I nor the article could be wrong regarding the above -- *because neither state the above*. Classic strawman on your part. According to the article, the expansion of sugar crops is happening in the cerrado savanna -- not...

Well, first we have to define "sustainable". According the article, tropical *sugar cane* based alcohol is the only one that has any significant energy gain ... that much of your assertion is true. However, since any practical gain in production requires deforestation, the carbon result of...

Hydroblunt: There is nothing sustainable about ethanol. Billdick: Why would you say such a stupid thing? Check out the cover and title article in the latest Time magazine. Quite well done IMO. JB

Been gone for a few days ... reviewed the thread and came to a clear conclusion regarding the above. Yep, it's him. JB

Well put hap -- I too have no use for Waels style (thought occasionally his substance has merit), but the banishment in light of other contributers here on ET was an error IMO. JB

TraderZones: >Try doing your homework first before displaying >so much ignorance. You don't even qualify as a >rank amateur. smilingsynic: >I have a degree from an evangelical university >(minored in Bible), and have a Ph.D. in religious >history. TZ, perhaps you should do...

Well, one thing is for certain ... you didn't (learn anything that is). Several people have already taken you to school on that one and you continue to claim the same old thing. JB

That's Ok, when you try it next year perhaps next year no one will notice and you can get away with it. JB

Cutten: >You are forgetting his wife. His marriage vows >prohibit infidelity - that's breach of contract. I'm betting you don't *know* what is marriage vows "prohibit". While you are *likely* correct, I've known several married couples who's vows did not include monogamy. JB

2C: >so your system allows the FBI - ie taxpayer financed >government officers paid to bust high crime type >outfits - to disclose details of the private life of a guy >who's paid for a few hookers to the media ahead of >even being able to articulate what exactly are the >serious...

You seem to think I'm defending the system. *I'm not*!!. I'm only telling you how the system works in this country -- and it's a system that Spitzer has played to the hilt to his advantage for years and years. You don't hear his high priced law team crying about the government violating his...

2C: >any event, has it been established by a court of law >that a crime has in fact been committed by spitzer yet, >ahead of having your taxpayer-financed witless FBI >eunuchs violate his privacy rights? There has been no "violation of privacy rights" here by the government. Period...

First off, I think prostitution should be legal, so I'm only stating what "is", not what "should be". >the guy paid to meet here and there, he >didn't organize anything therefore the Mann >act charge is bollocks... applies to the guys >who are running the "Club", not spitzer... If...

No, the felony violation is federal and thus not a state prosecution. JB

man: >his job does not work without credibility. Spot on. JB

Nutmeg: >Do you think he'd do it again? Well, Duh!! That's what addictions are like. JB

2C: >sure... and... where is his crime again? It's not a question of "where's the crime?" -- clearly, in that jurisdiction a crime was committed. The question is -- "where's the victim?". Some would argue that the wife is the victim -- ok, sure ... but no more the victim than if he...

Yep, that's my laugh about all this -- I couldn't care less what he spends on the hookers, or that he's into hookers ... it's the tough on crime guy out hopping the felony train that provides the fuel on this one. I think prosititution should be legal, but since it isn't, I hope they nail him...

Apparently you don't read well. If you notice the "more appropriate" (said admittedly with a touch of humor) comment in my post it will all make sense. JB