Search results

Happy Birthday!

SPX clown shoes has been tossed by Baron.

:thumbsup::fistbump:

No one has a grudge against you, you're just an annoying asshole. You think being neurotically critical of those far smarter and more accomplished than you makes you look good....it doesn't. Rather than infest others threads with your poser bullshit, start your own thread. Maybe you'll get more...

:D

That SPX guy is just an idiotic loser...best to ignore. The guy slithers from thread to thread trailing his loser stench.

Good luck to you sir.

SML, you were invited to participate in a Discord room where NQ and myself called real time trades all day long referring to Brooks, Halsey and a few others and explaining the technical rationale behind the trades. If you gained nothing from the experience then you didn't. It wasn't for lack of...

"You can observe a lot by just watching."....Yogi Berra

"He got too much shit to try and comprehend." You may have isolated your issue.

I had a similar experience with the first edition of the first book. It was poorly edited and not well written. I didn’t understand the quality of his work until someone convinced me to acquire the video course which is much more accessible than the books. I’ve gotten more out of the study than...

Volpri, your journal is excellent and clearly shows your understanding of Al’s work but you may as well try and teach mules to tap dance as convince anyone who would argue endlessly against something they know little to nothing about.

You’re the one concerned about padu. Maybe you can help him see the light. If I thought I could help padu, I would.

You and SimpleMeLike should team up, maybe do a GoFundMe to open an account. You can call it NotBrooks Capital. ET lol

ET lol

Yes, regardless of influences one has to make ideas, concepts and strategies one's own. We are all different and we all trade differently, some similarly sure but different none the less.

:D

Yes, it’s not the concept which pays the bills, it’s the trader. And taking concept to profitability is not for the underachiever.

Lol, I have no idea how Larry's ideas might test out. The point was, any technical hypothesis no matter how simple or abstract needs to be rigorously tested to determine if there is is indeed a viable and tradable edge.

The way to evaluate any strategy is to test a statistically significant data sample. The way not to evaluate a strategy would be to ask random anonymous "traders" on ET. That said, Larry Pesavento, a very smart fellow writes of Planetary Harmonics. Again, any validity to that or any other...