Search results

The comment he made proves to me his past associations are relevant. I could easily picture one of those past acquaintances saying something like that. Frank Marshall Davis for instance.

I'll be honest with you AAA. I became disillusioned by the fiscal lack of responsibility by the republicans some years back, but not enough to ever vote for a socialist. My own beliefs about life, 1rst and 2nd amendments prevent that, but it sure gets old voting against candidates. Would...

No comments? The guy said it. He is a redistributionist. Maybe to some it's worth it to have a great orator in power. Not me. I admire his honesty. A family member of mine and I have often discussed the possibility of an openly socialist candidate getting elected in the current...

Interesting exchange. Can be viewed at FOX via Breitbart, but knowing how some feel about that station, I won't waste time with a link. Obama wants to spread the wealth: Is this socialism, or not? "Your new tax plan is going to tax me more, isn't it?" the plumber asked, complaining that...

Your right. I should have said the repubs had not controlled both houses since 1954, beginning in 1994.

Wouldn't it be difficult to say as there are almost always a considerable difference of viewpoints? Wouldn't the majority need to be in agreement across the entire forum before it could be used as a contrarian indicator? I would say no.

It's all good:)

My hundred shares will make a difference...in my account

No economic news in the morning, I think the bond market is closed, g7 making headway, and futures moving up. Add in one hell of an oversold market with an intra day double bottom on Fri....my curiousity is peaked, long Q's at 30.50 for the weekend, and also hoping we zoom!:) Hope it lasts...

Here are some interesting stories. I don't believe we are any more or less vulnerable regardless of who wins the election. With open borders, airspace, and ports anything is possible. I think their is more concern over dirty bombs. http://www.cfr.org/publication/9549/...

YM +230 6pm US CST.

Then how did the dems maintain the congress from 1954 - 1994? Or do you believe the economy was good under Carter?

I have been trading 1 or two stocks at a time for 5 years and decided to switch to the futures and swings on Q's or Diamonds because too often: Stock wouldn't move with the market. Good earnings not meeting expectations would tank the stock. Biotech: Failed phase tests or lack of FDA...

You've just made what should be a 100% accurate prediction of the front page story in multiple mainstream media a week or so after he's inaugurated.

Perhaps Friday's action was a test of that area, give or take a few hundred points. I think a bear rally may be unfolding, but who knows? I picked up a few Q's at 30 for a swing, just in case. If the underlying issues in the world economy are not resolved, DOW 7500 will eventually be...

I would add to these truths the number of people, and I know a few, that don't really believe what happens in DC will effect them. Of course, that may be changing now that their retirement funds are vanishing.

Pretty much my thoughts. McCain had no business being on the top of the ticket. Being a maverick does not make him a reformer. He signed onto the big bailout after all the pork was added. I believe he blew it then. His lack of fire does not help, either. The dems will get the big prize...

I couldn't believe it when it happened, and now I'm stunned again. How the hell did McCain get to the top of ticket?:confused: The party is paying for it's "outspend the dems" ways now. Game over. BO in Nov, probably by a slide.

It would be nice if McCain would show some backbone and bring it to the attention of the masses tonight. At least they could do their own research and draw conclusions based on their findings. They could then decide whether this should be an issue for their vote instead of letting the media...