Search results

Where am I calling people names?? You're just nitpicking words when I was nicely discussing synthetic life with you. Where did I claim to be an expert? I didn't. Check yourself before you throw out the asshole card (for no good reason as I was totally cordial with you). What's your problem?

Why do you think stories written in an ancient time of no science, passed down orally for centuries before written on tablet/papyrus, more credible an explanation than experimentally verified theories such as the Big Bang, and mathematically possible multi-verse hypotheses. I also grew up in...

Right, option trading and cosmology go hand in hand. I'll keep that in mind. The Christian god is no more falsifiable than Zeus or Thor. So what are you claiming? It takes balls to admit you're wrong. Which I did. The risk was more than I expected. I'll admit I was humbled. Does that...

I was wrong. No need to be an asshole about it.

No shit Sherlock, what makes you think I didn't know that already. By "DNA synthesis", I meant a DNA molecule synthesized in a laboratory. I'm wondering why you've decided to be a complete asshole for no apparent reason.

I didn't. Look at what I said. "In fact, it's already happened in other ways, such as DNA synthesis."

What are you, like 12 years old?

Yea, it is. You can't seem to focus on the topic. Just ad hominems. I didn't know I had to prove your god for you. You make the positive claim for your god. YOU prove it. Not me. I am inexperienced in options. Big fucking deal. Is that all you've got in response to this topic...

Yes I have been reviewing their newsletters. It's been difficult to back test this because the test platform doesn't exactly simulate reality. My tests work spectacularly but real money trades are still lacking. They say selling far OTM puts on gold is a sure bet.

Are you this much of an asshole in real life?

They've done a lot since that experiment. The cite is my own opinion from what I have seen. We're halfway there. Soon, we'll be creating artificial life. In fact, it's already happened in other ways, such as DNA synthesis.

You would be surprised. Scientists can now make amino acids from basic organic compounds founds all over the universe. We know what chemicals make up life and especially DNA but the problem is the process in which this occurred is still unknown. Within just a few years, we will know, most...

Ha! It happened. I took a 5x loss on corn. You guys were right. Dangerous indeed. Kind of looks like a Taleb distribution of returns, doesn't it? So how does this Liberty Trading Group do it so well? They wrote a book called The Complete Guide to Option Selling where they detail this far OTM...

It's a pathetic attempt to discredit the person, not the argument. You're certainly welcome to return to the discussion at hand, and away from me personally. Tell me what special knowledge you have to prove the Christian god is more real than Zeus or Thor. The burden of proof is on you...

Really wish we could find out for sure which will never happen in our lifetime. Bummer.

Spare me this useless rhetoric please. The anthropic principle simply states that observations of the physical universe must be compatible with the conscious life that observes it. This is, however, not evidence of a fine-tuner. As I said, the appearance of fine-tuning is not evidence of...

I have been trading options for 6 months without anyone teaching me. I think there are things I have to learn the hard way. So what? Frankly, it's pathetically irrelevant. The Christian god is no more real than Zeus or Thor. Why can't they have their own Pascal's Wager? My point is Pascal's...

You're free to not acknowledge there are appropriate and inappropriate uses of argumentum ad populum.

That's the first time I've seen someone equate the ability to have an opinion on science with how well they trade options. LOL. My bad, next time I'll use Zeus or Thor. Anyways with all due civility, the point was you can substitute any god into the Pascal's Wager argument, and frankly, it...

That's your interpretation (a wrong one). If the underlying belief/theory is true, then it is a valid argument. If the belief/theory is not true, then it's not a valid argument. It's valid to mention the vast majority of scientists believe the earth is round (or that evolution is scientific...