Search results

Well, he did put some people on the ignore... I have not put anyone yet... not even Longshot...but I do watch Harry, yet reserving my critical opinion as usual.

too hard on the original poster. Usually, when people like him get so excited it's a good sign to fade them...

I usually agree with inandlong, although I prefer stochastics divergences. Anyway, good luck.

You made it for the invited... and why have we not been told this at once? Do you know what the full disclosure is about? I don't think so. I would not trust anyone who acts like you, even if what they offer is for free. I have had very bad experience with people who do not tell things...

That's very responsible of you. The method however is very simple and can be used profitably. You just need some practice, perhaps adding some filters. Perhaps 2 min timeframe will prove better, 1 min bars create too much noise. Anyway, good luck.

Well, well, well.... you must be new. Jack is just Jack, take it or leave it. Trying to understand him is just an exercise in futility and there is probably no contents in what he says, but since it's so hard to understand him, let's not imply that he is a fool. That's impolite too. But you made...

Got it free... no thanks.

Yeah, I understand. I am not sure if something like that exists, but I think that there is a market for it, so perhaps someone has already made it. I just don't know.

no problems with the first one, some small with the other one, but could fix them myself.

for $40 a month can do it for you. You need to collect the data everyday, you get a two week historical intraday data when you sign up. AutoTrader has something similar, but I do not know what else you need to have to use it.

of the system can be as wacky as trading at random times. It does not matter if they make sense (in fact, perhaps it's even better if they don't because this means that most will not follow it and that may give you some edge), what matters is whether the system makes money or not. A good trader...

Of course, that's precisely the reason some are not successful, because they do not follow any system. They might have not even identified a set of rules that they need to follow. Mechanical or nor, it does not matter. It is the rules that matter. If you have the rules then you have a system, if...

So pink things are actually pink. Hmm...

That's the most important thing. You don't want to trade the system that you do not understand. It's at least as important to understand the system as to backtest it. Most people stop at backtesting. That's not enough to be able to trade the system comfortably.

Let's not get overly carried away... Tick, trin, volume can be very successfully used via their divergences with the price. This is the best way to employ them and the most reliable one. Tick can hardly be used as a leading indicator and I know of no leading indicator for futures, anyway...

Well put and why has this been so totally lost on so many who contributed to this thread? That beats me....

You are absolutely right, that's my definition of being rich pretty much too. To be free and to have time to pursue things that really appeal to you. Good luck.

I guess it's just simple... that's a big plus, IMO. I don't use it, but have one of his CDs.

Exactly, that's about all one can say about it. No one studied it in any objective way, so it depends, on your setups, your targets, your system, your mood, and who knows what else. And on the day too...

on the meditative states that I know of is by David Goleman, Ph.D. in psychology. The book's title is 'The Meditative Mind'. The book mentions levitation briefly in just one sentence and in quotation marks as "levitation".