You seem to have the mechanics down.
The option prices are based on SPY = 131.30.
If you bought at 131, then you should compare the $50 CC profit to the current $30 realizable profit.
One other possible outcome is called pin risk. If SPY was trading at 120 (the call strike) at April...
A few mistakes there.
The cost basis is 8690 less 8500 (strike value) = -190 loss.
The option had 0 volume and OI was 1. No liquidity.
Looking at the 44.10 last sale, we see it was a Jan. 24 trade.
With SPY at 131.30 yahoo shows the current bid for the call at 46.30 or parity...
Yes it does make sense to trade the UL if you're not liking the spreads.
Obviously, you can get a more favorable R:R by selling ITM puts. Some option traders would look to the equivalent OTM bull call spread rather than ITM puts.
"Neither cancel/modify fees nor execution credits are not applied to US Option combination orders."
There seems to be an error. IB please clarify. Use of double negative implies that cancel fees are applied - when I believe that the writer meant the opposite.
Should read:
"Neither...
I know that you're supposed to control your emoticons while trading, but the past few weeks have been extraordinary - I would imagine for many traders - so here goes:
:( :mad: :eek: :) :p :D :cool: :mad: :) :confused:
Or how I turned a large loss into a large profit into a small profit...
Nah, the risk free profit in the OP doesn't make sense.
The B/As at the time were approx:
106C - 2.02x2.09
104P - 2.78x2.87
OP, don't know where you got your data from. If it's based on last sale then it probably won't have real time relevance.
Yes, good example.
It would make sense that a well-defined binary event may produce a frown. Perhaps it is rare because many of these situations are not well-defined or truly binary.
No, not exactly, unless you can forecast IV, exactly.
I seldom use a calc when I do it's ivolatility.com basic calc.
Change days to expiry, the UL price and viola. You can also change divs, IV and i rate if you wish.