Search results

dunno about the 401 specific example but arca says this: Listed executed orders that are initially entered as odd-lot orders and executed against the book or by another market center $0.03 per share .20 per share is absurd.

I'm not going near this one buy somehow I don't think this guy was telling you to buy it on fundamentals.

I don't understand your comment about some Americans???

How does that affect a dual monitor setup?

right click on chart and you should see a menu for changing colors.

you definitely missed the point. some traders were selling the stock when it resumed and thought they were long. THEY WEREN'T since the trades were busted. if you can't see the problem now, i don't know what to say.

no problems here

Can't access the attachment

their job to make a fair market. how do you explain canceling trades after they resumed trading? that's not doing their job of protecting.

scroll to the bottom on the left side. as you can tell, its listed numerically going from 1000 down to 8000 (from top to bottom). you will see a "+" next to the 8000. that means that there's more. if you click on the "+", it will show all the procedural rules down to 11900. from there, if...

Fourcups had it wrong. I believe it was rule 11890. Clearly Erroneous Transactions http://cchwallstreet.com/nasd/nasdviewer.asp?SelectedNode=4&FileName=/nasd/nasd_rules/RulesoftheAssociation_mg.xml#chp_1_4 scroll towards the bottom

i know of another big firm offering convs

the most ridiculous statement they've ever made. they are the ones who are supposed to provide a "FAIR and ORDERLY" market. its their fault.

Hmm, I guess if you ever make a bad mistake and put in a wrong price in the system and it doesn't work in your favor, you should just call nasdaq to break the trades. Screw everyone else. That's what they are basically saying. They have just set a precedence.

exactly, the party who made the error is the one who walked away without a scratch. most everyone else got screwed. already contacted lawyers who feel there is a good case for some recourse. i'm not counting on it but it won't cost me a retainer so what the hell. whatever i get is a bonus.

i hear that some firms' legal counsel are working on this situation

I use the RAID 1. Its a no hassle way to back up.

You're right about not all successful people in the financial markets are "mba types" but I think I can safely say that since they are more prepared for it and obviously have better than average smarts that they have a better chance of succeeding. In general, who would you want to run your...

bullets were a tool that traders used. why are so many people complaining when some traders say they miss them. take away one of your tools and see if you complain. it was legal, so traders used them. its now illegal so traders don't anymore. why is this question being asked over and over...

what is the reasoning behind that? its like saying people using charts should not be trading. they were a tool. although i didn't use them exclusively, many have. a good trader will use whatever tool is available to make money.