Search results

The reason why products were built for windows was due to the luck in become the os for the ibm-spec pc, microsoft then started to sell the os to the clones. Microsoft then started to give kickbacks to oems to sell MS software in place of other software in order for the oem to receive...

To the pompous BS spam artist: You're calling me lazy. ROFLMAO You can't even do your own research. REALITY CHECK: No one is going to do any research for a loser posting garbage on an anonymous forum.

To the pompous BS spam artist: You keep avoiding the question, where is the one successful innovated product? NAME THE MAGIC ONE...... t's your claim for 10,000 so-called innvoations, you cannot do your own research how pathetic. So you still haven't found the magic one out of...

To the pompous BS spam artist: You keep avoiding the question, where is the one successful innovated product? NAME THE MAGIC ONE...... t's your claim for 10,000 so-called innvoations, you cannot do your own research how pathetic. So you still haven't found the magic one out of...

To the pompous BS spam artist: Windows origins are closely tied to 86-dos, cp/m and xerox, that is fact. Copying is not "innovation". You keep avoiding the question, where is the one successful innovated product? YOU STILL CANNOT NAME EVEN ONE...... So you still haven't found...

To the pompous BS artist: So you continue to deny cp/m, you deny SCP and 86-dos, and you deny the Xerox OS even now, which is basic fact. Still wandering about in your fantasy world. You still have not named the 1 magic internally innovated successful product out of 10,000. NOT 1...

LOL Read the history of Microsoft http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Microsoft MS bought 86-dos from SCP after it was awarded the contract to provide a version of the cp/m system. The gui itself was developed by Xerox. After IBM awarded MS the contract, it become the spec for the...

To the pompous BS artist: So you continue to deny cp/m, you deny SCP and 86-dos, and you deny the Xerox OS. How original. Yet you still won't say what MS has successfully internally innovated specifically. You still don't know after 150 posts, that is just abysmal. NOT 1 OUT OF...

To the pompous BS spam artist: You keep avoiding the question, where is the one successful innovated product? STILL WAITING FOR THE MAGIC ONE...... So you still haven't found the magic one out of 10,000. No wonder why you are so acrimonious. NOT ONE OUT OF 10,000 lol...

To the pompous BS spam artist: You keep avoiding the question, where is the one successful innovated product? JUST SHOW THE MAGIC ONE...... So you still haven't found the magic one out of 10,000. No wonder why you are so acrimonious. NOT ONE OUT OF 10,000 lol Name...

To the pompous BS spam artist: So copying is innovation, what a fantasy world you have. You keep avoiding the question, where is the one successful innovated product? Still waiting for the magic one.......... So you still haven't found the magic one out of 10,000. No wonder why...

To the pompous BS spam artist: You keep avoiding the question, where is the one successful innovated product? Your lips obviously have nothing to say about even 1 out of allegedly 10,000. You are incapable of justifying your own argument. Do your own research I've showed you the MS...

To the pompous BS spam artist: You keep avoiding the question, where is the one successful innovated product? Your lips obviously have nothing to say about even 1 out of allegedly 10,000. You are incapable of justifying your own argument. Do your own research I've showed you the MS...

To the pompous BS spam artist: You keep avoiding the question, where is the one successful innovated product? Your lips obviously have nothing to say about even 1 out of allegedly 10,000. You are incapable of justifying your own argument. NOT ONE OUT OF 10,000 lol Name all...

To the pompous BS spam artist: You keep avoiding the question, where is the one successful innovated product? Your lips obviously have nothing to say about even 1 out of allegedly 10,000. You are incapable of justifying your own argument. Name all the great Microsoft...

To the pompous BS spam artist: You keep avoiding the question, where is the one successful innovated product? Your lips obviously have nothing to say about even 1 out of allegedly 10,000. Name all the great Microsoft innovations..... Until you do so, you are an outright fraud.

So copying cp/m by the way of buying 86-DOS and implementing a Xerox-style gui is innovation? That is imitation, not "innovation".

Microsoft did not invent the operating system, by any means. Windows, that's a joke right? So 86-DOS, CP/M and Xerox had no influence on MS whatsoever? hmmm >Bill gates did not innovate anything for MS. Microsoft's original OS DOS was 86-DOS created by Seattle Computer Products...

To the pompous BS spam artist: You keep avoiding the question, where is the one successful innovated product? Name all the great Microsoft innovations..... Until you do so, you are an outright fraud.

To the pompous BS spam artist: Microsoft has copied others, that is the reason for their success. Quite some fantasy world that you have created. STILL NOT ANY MENTION OF ONE SUCCESSFUL INNOVATION. You don't even have the capacity to make a thoughtful argument. Name all...