Search results

In dec 2007, the market touched the 20 month and asked 'since the end of feb 2006, right now, do things look better, or worse than average for that period of time?" the market said 'worse' and closed below ironically, 20 months later (a few days ago) the market asked the same question...

not directly, but i most definately form my market context off of it, ie, what i think the shorter timeframes are trying to fill out, where I think they are ultimately going, or could go - it's why i didnt think that the march rally was 'too high' until it hit the 20 month, although i was kind...

selling has paused, and the market is drifting higher before it resumes?

just an idea, read things a little more closely before going a few rounds defending a wrong position - you'll look a little less stupid "Guess I should have done that but I have never seen anyone use a 200 month MA for technical analysis. " did you notice that the 200 month avg is the...

i wouldn't trust goldman offering me a glass of water, if i were dying of thirst in the desert

you're dead wrong 200 month spx ma - 1022 200 day spx ma - 901 (which, by the way, is bearish, IMO) you're a fucking retard did you even both to check the 200 day level on the spx (and notice that it's 120 points BELOW) before your wrote this asinine stuff?!?!?!?!

ok, enough with your stupid signature on ignore

in all this time, every close across the 20 month ma has been a major change in trend

no, actually, it isn't here's the chart i put up on page one of this thread what part of 'monthly', dont you get, 'dude'? <img src = "http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=2594812">

"Democrats are in charge of all three branches of government and they don't have the stones to start standing up to this garbage " 'stones' aren't the issue here. democrats are a false 'opposition' party that's owned by the same people who own the republicans what is the word for owning...

one should think the US government is winning the war on the American Citizen

"but Goldman, also gave warnings on US Treasuries, citing fiscally irresponsible actions by the US Government in the past year" (no, they did not actually say that, but they would have the gall to)

huh? (and I havent cited '50' anything)

"If I were going to make a case for being in a 'bear market' I would at least expect to see prices on the left side of the chart to be higher than prices on the right. " maybe you need glasses, I see higher prices on the left side of the chart, as far back as 1998, 11 years i see them...

"In a bull market, which we are currently in" really? whole rally looks like little more than a backtest of the spx 200 month moving average to me - i don't see a siuper-bear trendline broken, do you? tring to determine what 'they' are all thinking, and then being a 'contrarion', is...

why, quite simply! he build capital from his trading success! if he's a 'success', with a 'successful record', but 'needs money', he's a degenerate gambler in denial, and people would be insane to give him money

"Calling market top or bottom is fun just as driving golf balls is. Drilling down and continually taking the market's offer takes more; it takes accepting the market's "tells" and executing in a timely manner minute after minute as the day goes forward." well, how bout starting your own...

i'm not a fan of letterman, but i respect his handling of this matter, crushing a blackmailer and letting the chips fall where they may

ITS BACK

i still have CL quotes active on my TWS, but all the rest is blank gonna have some pissed off people if it's down past 4:15 eastern