Too funny you have it exactly backwards as a liberal, mcVain had it wrapped up with Palin's nomination, then he quit campaigning so he could side with obama on the bailout (which 85% of the public disagreed with).
So in one fell swoop he proved his claim "didn't know much about economics" and...
I predict in 20 yrs the birthers will be vindicated in the eyes of all who didn't vote for him.
Those who did vote for obama can still argue the moon landings were fake.
1) they don't and I've already explained to you why collectivists aka (liberals) are running the political arena.
2) if you want a fools answer I suggest in no particular order:
brass, rcg trader, future currents, big(snicker)arrow, etc
I'm curious as to how you came to cast the vote you did.
1) less conservative at the time
2) poor due diligence (ie only listening to MSM outlets)
3) Wishful thinking
Color me skeptical because the US govt has long operated on the premise that it can do ANYTHING that it wants to irrespective of the constitution or Congress. (cases in point Creation of nsa, interstate commerce )
I suppose I disagree due to my bias of only being able to use 7th grade math.
I consider myself to be more of a speculative investor than a trader.
Perhaps that's because I think traders believe in a lot of market hocus pocus superstitions and brazenly call it "technical analysis".
kinda...
Sometimes I think it's easier to fool smart people than common folk on many issues (including investing).
All someone has to do is appeal to "how special " they think they are.
case in point, who would invest, follow a strategy or fund named after the most destructive blow up in the universe.
Perhaps they are concerned about truth in advertising, :eek:
http://www.fool.com/fool/free-report/1502/supernova-day7-01-180087.aspx?source=isnxsleml0000130
Ultimately all I think the liberal idiots have left is a ban on skittles.
Obviously something triggered the angelic teen's violent behavior and never ever is it the responsibility of the anointed's poor choices.