Search results

I agree, it may well have been recently dug up though there is no real mention of when it was found. I don't see that is the issue anyway. Because artifacts are dug up with names or references on them, doesn't help in any way confirm a biblical account of Jerusalem as the thread title...

I accept your apology. oops I mean I accept your apology. Of course by posting in the largest font size possible, not adjusting it and lying about not knowing how to, the angry tone and the name calling, you mean to communicate no emphasis. I did no such thing. There is no reason to doubt that...

Look at the ribbon in the reply box. See the B and the T! symbols in there? They change font with a bunch of other stuff. You knew that right? No one can be that unknowledgeable about how to format a post when they have made nearly 28 thousand of them like you have. So how is it you've managed...

Your whole post, not just text from your (wrong!) link, was in shout sized font. It is easy to adjust the font size. When you posted you must have seen it was in shout sized font. If you didn't want to shout, why did you shout. Why do you think when you shout people shouldn't think you are...

Jumping to the wrong conclusion, pasting a wrong link, as usual displays either you can't or won't understand what's being said. Or you're a complete idiot. Odds are firmly on the latter.

I agree. The thread title is bullshit and indeed as already pointed out, likewise anyone reading Harry Potter 2,700 years in the future wouldn't have much reason to doubt London had a particular rail station named King's Cross and a Mayor to go with it either. Well yes, but if you don't mind...

If you did some research you'd notice your link is to a different seal, not the seal in the OP of this thread. In fact it is in an article a year earlier.:rolleyes: The current artifact happened to conveniently turn up along with a controversial political move. Which is of course what I was...

Remove a single letter from your unintelligent response..... anger.. says the evangelical theist who shits on every God or Jesus religion thread on ET... with lies and bullshit. ...and considering your posting history, that's a lot of unintentional unconscious self-reflection you have going on...

If you weren't such an angry , paranoid reactionary, you might be able to understand what I said.

Trump recognizes Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and lo, it came to pass, that an artifact, inscribed in Hebrew as “belonging to the governor of the city” (begging the obvious question which city - could be from any city) is resurrected. Praise be. Interesting how people make all these so called...

False. You still need to address the real issue. The fundamental basic principles of physical chemistry show that (man made) CO2 will warm the Earth. (man made) CO2 must cause warming according to those basic principles of physical chemistry. Where there isn't any peer reviewed science is in...

Problem is, he has said things on similar lines previously and his research was found to be seriously flawed. All he seems to be doing here is providing an extra category for amplification. But fundamentally his basic proposition still doesn't overcome its initial flaws. It is not what he...

Yes, and many experts who didn't believe curvature of spacetime causes Gravity, or natural selection causes Evolution. Many.

I can certainly agree with that. I'd go as far as to say - robust... has nothing to do with any of your statements. Thing is, you need to deal with the real issue which is that according to the fundamental basic principles of physical chemistry, the relationship between (man made) CO2 and...

The accuracy of global CO2 readings are extremely good. They are direct and observable and measurable. Thanks to modern tech, proxies for ancient CO2 levels are also very robust. It isn't rocket science but it is science.

It's surely not a case of either/or. CFCs HFCs CO2, they all cause serious problems for the planet.

CFCs (Chlorofluorocarbons) have been banned. You will know CFCs cause ozone depletion and Ozone limits UV rays entering the atmosphere. Depleted Ozone (due to CFCs) threatens extremely harmful outcomes like skin cancer and the eradication of species. CO2 has a different chemical mechanism...

New Study which is basically Old Study. Svensmark had already written his -Variations on a Cosmic Ray Theory - but has shown on each occasion their basic science was wrong . Unfortunately he has in the past made lame excuse for some serious flaws and fundamental errors , attempting to salvage...