Search results

:)

Yes, this post provides the answer. I missed it and was mistakenly looking at a different post by Avi 8 when I made comments following my original question. The bar in question (11:45) meets the definition of Spike Bar and as such does not complete the sequence required for a Traverse...

Apologies, I missed that one and I thought that you were referring to a different post of his, the one with picture. Confusion on my part, as I was looking at that one. Sincere apologies.

Gaussians corrected based on how the market turned out after 11:45

Apologies for not stating the question precisely. The question to which I am unable to find an answer after debrief is this: (a) "How can one know that 1145 bar (the last bar in the attached) does not complete the sequence required for Traverse and does not provide a signal for change on...

Aside from the fact that 1145 is OB (which is not how I have observed sequence completion 'normally' take place) I don't see anything to suggest in real time, that 1130 isn't a pt3. I am unable to see any clues in that drawing that says anything other than :"The market proved you wrong, it...

so far

Spydertrader, if you'd be so kind - could you comment on why 11:45 did not complete the sequence. I suspect the 'outside bar(ness)' of that bar may have something to do with it, but can not figure the reasons why. Thank you.

Inside the 1st lateral of the day the price is moving p2 ->p3. Both IBV bars after the lateral ends have their incr. volume as a result of lateral BO and spike bar. If market is still to transition from non-dominant to dominant, then the sequence for up traverse does not seem to be completed to...

Thank you, lj. It worked. Have a good weekend.

Thanks, lj. But I am not sure what you mean by "reinstall the desktop". Attached is my view of "workspace' dropdown. What am I suppose to click there to reinstall the desktop? Thank you.

I just lost PP_JHMVolume on YM on two separate PC's simultaneously. On both PC's YM volume pane is empty. Please help.

I have defined for myself a Traverse Level Signal for Change as something that which if occurs after sequence completion results in change of trend 100% of the time. While reviewing the charts, I have found the evidence that Pennant FBO (where price exits the boundaries established by the 1st...

I take it that the sequence was not completed on 1535 bar and 1525 was not what I thought it was.

:D Thank you for having a patience to repeat it for those of us (mostly me, I suspect) who are both hard of hearing and somewhat 'observationally' challenged. My hypothesis is as follows. It is known that every signal for change is also an FTT (except for VE on decr. Volume and LTL...

- in responce to: Spydertrader, please correct me if I am wrong. It appears to me that permission to seek change exists on 10:10 bar and therefore in search for the reasons why 10:15 isn't a signal for change one can exclude an uncompleted sequence and concentrate on the real issue of...

Thank you, very helpful.

Thank you for the chart. Would you consider the 14:55 [close of] Bar to be not Pennant FBO, as it does not leave the boundaries established by the first Bar of the pennant, and as such the increasing red Volume on that (14:55 [close of] Bar) would not be one of the three cases where...

What you call a corruption, we, in the US, call a "political process". Very little difference, a bit more civilized, is all.

Sometimes all you need is a little gentle push and everything goes hell in a basket and there's blood on the street. Which is supposed to be a good time to buy. Taking advantage of an opportunity they call it:D And why spend your own money when you can get it from congress, interst free (I...