Search results

Actually the little smiley face means that it was a sardonic comment.

:) No, it means it's a sign of the apocolypse.

Other examples of this logic: "I have ice in my drink therefore global warming isn't happening." "Winter means winter -- everywhere. Australia? Look, if they're not having winter then that's their problem, not ours." "It rained in Topeka -- thank goodness because there was a drought...

Okay, take even one of his points: that your "Video Perfesser" non-climatologist, non-remote control user cherry picked one out of 92 or so studies. True or false? You don't even have to post more than that -- just pick one of either true or false.

Ahh, okay, so the "low rate of (temperature) change" that you referred to caused a very significant increase in CO2 levels (seen below). Therefore, according to you, the temperature has had a low rate of increase before 1958 since (you claim) CO2 only lags temperature change. You can see the...

You wrote, exactly: "In fact recent few thousand years have very low rate of temperature change when compared to previous periods." You also wrote that CO2 lags temperature. Therefore your explanation for current CO2 rises is that it's rising although temperature has a very low rate of...

I've been following his posts for quite some time, they are shockingly accurate. In fact, he sourced the data just now for a guy YOU cited, then explained how the data was non-reflective of the actual research. In response, you posted "Derp derp derp derp derp... durrr... derp." You did not...

So when you said that temperature lags CO2, you meant that it was because temperature changed at some point in the past, but is not changing now, therefore CO2 levels are increasing. Do I have your position correct? I still have not seen the movie. I suggest you find more reliable...

His views have to carry more weight in the scientific community, as his views have not yet been publicly discredited as Lord Moncton, 3rd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley, has been discredited.

That's a different conversation, and it's impossible to tie individual weather events to global warming (at this time). However, it's likely that this is true, at least for some areas of the planet, but not relevant to the conversation at hand as it is not provable.

Actually the incorrect statement was that extreme weather "causes" global warming -- exactly the reverse.

You have already stated that CO2 lags temperature change. If your post here is correct, where is the temperature change (you have already written that it is not happening.)? Because you don't understand it? Do you understand that a CO2 molecule is extra-efficient at absorbing infra-red energy?

"Arguing that something is a part of" =/= "causes"

Biology ignorant? CO2 levels are increasing. You have said that CO2 levels lag temperature change (which is only partially correct.) You have posted video that temperature levels are not increasing. Can you recognize that your argument cannot fit together? Let me sum your rant up...

Extreme weather doesn't "cause" anything, except for window damage and flooding. "Extreme weather" does not "cause" global warming. No. You have successfully confused facts about historical CO2 emissions from oceans and land masses caused by higher temperatures hundreds of thousands of...

According to the IPCC report (which is what you should be sourcing, not Youtube videos, not movies) "[t]here is no clear trend in the annual numbers [i.e. frequency] of tropical cyclones." There is, for what it's worth, an increase in storms in the North Atlantic, however there's no way (yet)...

1) I have no idea what should be in a film, except for comedies. 2) Extreme weather is not a "cause" of global warming. Global warming has been shown through isotope measurements unequivocally to be caused by man-made CO2 production .

I don't remember having seen these, but I'll certainly be happy to answer your points with: Local temperature variations are not relevant, as the discussion is regarding a global climate issue.

I haven't seen the film.

Okay, I'm impressed -- you were able to find what the heck he was discussing. Tresor will laugh hysterically as he rides his Kamikaze argument into the ocean.