Search results

Show me..............a..................public company that doesn't have lawsuits pending. Plural. Besides, what bearing does this have on the stock price? It might have some bearing on mass perception, but it's the specialist that determines bid. As such, any lawsuit, hint of a lawsuit, or...

Glad you didn't get your feelings hurt. It wasn't the intent. Back to Graham. He has no place on a trading site. Yes, good old Warren worked for the Graham-Newman corp in the 1950's. Ben I believe had an affair with his own son's wife. He acquired control of Geico in 1976 for a song...

Been here all of 8 months and past the thousand mark. Good job. Should I research and see what proportion are worth a shit? As for the OP, most books have a pearl or two of wisdom. But geared toward selling books. Authors that don't trade "speaks" for itself. The first book I'd...

1. Read the last sentence you wrote. 2. Then look in the mirror.

Those that can, "do". Those that can't............eh...........teach. Or, is it the distinction between walking the walk and talking the talk? Then again, it could be fishing versus cutting bait. I don't know, I get sooooooooo confused.

It is? I see a neckline, meaning support (at best).

Actually I'm not too concerned about any change in lending standards. Has no bearing on the paper other than as an alibi. For it to A. Be halted. B Re-open in the single digits, the specialist would have to be void of inventory. That might be the case, but given heavy volume for weeks and...

Didn't say I liked it. Looking to either make a more gracious exit OR add to the position (as the case may be). At times, willing to sacrifice two pawns for a rook. You've neglected to answer my general question about lending standards, or, more specifically, the distinction between...

Freefall? 3%? That's not even one ATR. It's so scathing. What am I gonna do? Gosh.

To answer your last question first, and.........to use Longhorn's words, "obviously" positons are being taken for a transaction to occur. This isn't an asset play. Except............ that underlying collateral is indeed tangible and desirable (albeit location dependant). In a BK, more...

1. Shady? Ever done business with them? Doubt it. But, your buddies might be shady. Birds of a feather? 2. There is always some demand for houses, and in turn funding. Always. Active secondary market coupled to the second largest mortgage originator. How much is warehoused and how much...

Not inbred Not a hick Not a troll. Pssst, check your mirror. My attention span is a little "longer" than the life span of a fruit fly. Bought my first stock in 1968 Been eating my own cooking since 1983. Before you got your finger wet. Had several 3-baggers first quarter...

Yep, I have a position. Yep it's a losing posiiton. But it's managable. You see, unlike you, I adhere to position size. I only advance when I know I don't have to retreat. I'm still planning on eventually advancing. I imagine the ax is too, once he has enough inventory. My beef...

What's so strange about tapping a credit line. It was availed to them. Is it term debt or a revolver? Secured or unsecured? What exactly does tapping a LOC have to do with the stock price? They're mutually exclusive.

"nother brilliant ONE liner cowboy? Are YOU as tuff in person as YOU are behind the screen? Note I didn't write "original" Just so this has an element of substance, gap down open today. Specialist moved away from his short basis. He put on the brakes at $19.53. Probably because of a...

Actually, it's..........eh.........."Maaco". But, you're excused since I have realistic expectations from impressionable zits. We'll save the late, great, Earl Schieb for another day.

Is it? Needs 25% just to get back to where it was. Kinda late to the party, aren't cha?

Yeah, I know, pounding out dimes. And climbing out of your diaper to tell the world about it. Get some here. Piss it away there. Consequently, no concern for taxes. No real surprise. And.............from the looks of things, an impressionable one trick pony.

Not trying to scare you. Amused with your ego needs. Pointing out you're babbling about a one-bagger that's already moved from $45 to $15. As for the specialist, why he's the entity most married to this stock. IF you get a lick, it stems from his agenda, not your trading acumen. Just along...

1. Payout? Maximum potential nominal gain, 100%. A one bagger. Wouldn't be overnight. It's the same 100% from $50 to 0 or $20 to 0. Problem is, $50 to $20 has already occurred. And, ask any real short seller about the "last buck". 2.. Yes, there is the CBOE. A whole new den of thieves...