Search results

Bravo you just pinpoint the core of the problem :D As for myself I never go farther than abc with Elliottness:D Happily I can do my own kind of elliott charts with my model (It's a degradation of my model but more easy to interpret and then check afterwards on the model): My model inject...

777 : Are you sure ? It is 888 JC number :D More seriously - I assure you I'm serious :) - look towards zone x666 and x888 I remark that x666 often act as buying zone and x888 as selling zone does it mean God is against Market and that Market is really Satan :D

Vade Retro Satanas :D

I explained above that these numbers are just measures. What you will do with them will depend on your own system. But as for stops what I want to explain is that one of the frequent reason s novices lose is that their stop is too tight compared to the CAPABILITY of THEIR system (so I don't mean...

Funny how he gets on nerve for nothing especially when he doesn't even understand probability : probability means that you behave as if you have no special knowledge about where the market is going (even if you think you know) or if one prefers if you are wrong in your judgement of market: do...

I don't have calculations yet for SP - because I don't trade SP - but I can do so perhaps tuesday (Monday I will be too busy) and now I have to go somewhere. Sure I talk about the loss : it's in the title :). Nevertheless I didn't say that you should absolutly put your stop equal to that...

I wonder if sometimes debates are not just launched for a pretext to chat :D. In every domain you have endlessly debates. I will take an other field to illustrate what I mean: In programing there has been a debate a long time ago between "ASM (Assembler langage) and C" then more recently...

I think you should correct your phrase because some words are missing or I really don't understand ...

See url of the trading system I have posted: it is based on 3 MAs: 6 10 and 16 http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?threadid=14565 It will also show you that what is important is not tools but the FRAMEWORK for using the tools. I have repeated the term FRAMEWORK in many posts...

<IMG SRC=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=212051> This is an estimation of Dow Jones "intrinsic" standard deviations for each scale intervention I use the term intrinsic in the sens used in quality statistical control: intrinsic means the minimal expected standard...

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=14554&perpage=6&pagenumber=2

The market is following the blue path on my weekly and monthly charts: he is consolidating a long term bearish trend. The blue path projects higher price so I am BULLISH for SHORT TERM (see the circles). At LONG TERM things remain VERY BEARISH (see the pentagon): More details on the number...

I'm sure you will also agree for this one (about Money Management) :) http://keplerweb.oeh.uni-linz.ac.at/trading/moneyMan1.htm And if you trade futures (for stocks it is less crucial because leverage is less so precision is not required) you should absolutly know about Fibonacci levels...

Analogy is not a scientific demonstration. Analogy is just a parabol. When for example I said that my model exhibits Feynman like effect like in Quantum Theory I don't justify my model with Quantum Theory I just say that I just OBSERVE same behavior it doesn't mean that my model has been based...

It is the same cycle again and again: the first speculators that were winning are rendering what they won and are even in losing position and they will quit soon whereas newcomers will enter and the market will let them win, acquire confidence, and as the former take their gain back etc. etc. an...

I began to trade 7 years ago. I trade stocks 1 month : was enough to judge that's I worked for the brokers so I went straight to futures market :). Nevertheless some people won't be able to do so if they are undercapitalised, stressed by speed or on the contrary overexcited by the adrenalin that...

>Trading is an "Art". Hence, there is no rule that will always >work. Rule by definition never always work, if they always works they should be called Law. >There were situations that I earned big money by averaging >down. Of course if not so why would be the question :) The problem is...

Approaching the stock market by an entropic approach (I'm smiling "entropic" is like the "new economy" fashion way of saying stochastics) is the poorest one. That is the only way pure mathematic can do it since it sees everything as points and can't invent outside knowledge. Shanon or kelly...

Hurry because they intend to change futures also for example by requiring 50000$ for opening an account and why not like PDT you won't be able to trade each time you will be under 50000$. Don't forget the market has not been created for the wealth of speculators but it organisers if you don't...

I will give the impression to some of you who reads me of repeating the same thing one hundred times but I will do it again until everybody get accustomed to the idea that WHAT IS IMPORTANT IS THE FRAMEWORK :) One thing that is GOOD inside a FRAMEWORK can be DEVASTATING inside another...