Search results

Above a certain income level-it’s really all about your relative level to your surroundings/Jonesses which counts for your feeling. A lambo is just an (uncomfortable) car, and rich friends aren’t really nicer than poor friends(zero correlation kindness and income level). And when you are earning...

So this will be the zerohedge-II channel? You can’t stop innovation. Europe tries to some extend, but won’t work

But isn’t this basically index investing, since you only stay in the best performers?

Just found out I have a ‘double account’ apparently, will delete the ‘123’

I must say this boomer shift story also has a (grey) beard. Same story 20y ago we would see an enormous shift.. It’s just one of the narratives I suppose :rolleyes:

Lol, in my tienies/twenties I always thought everyone bought a car relative to their income. I could never imagine - now forties - (fast depreciating assets aside) not getting that attention would also be an asset in itself

Funny there is a point in that. But an 1933 egg = a 2024 egg (okay one could debate this), while a 1933 pickup is not a 2024 pickup (comfort, range). So if we inflate price, we need to also inflate all the other product characteristics. Impossible job I know :)

Maybe Samsara (IOT) would be interesting?- after a dip back to 29. Read somewhere this could be an interesting one too (multi year), but I totally can not judge stocks, so big block of salt.

Long & put with strike of call = same. So buy call and putspread. Less costs, because otm. But interesting strategy? Not really. Maybe if asset rises 200% per t and crashes >50% often. But that would be reflected in price put

sorry disagree, there are a lot of quiet successful traders. It attracts introverts for a reason

Assuming you have iq > 120 like a college student it doesn’t, yet. Specialized advice is worth gold, to the advisee at least. But how about that other 90 % population white collar workers?

These companies are not 15-years olds' in basements For the percentage you can ask bing A.I.

And added Mars and Jupiter combined. No need for SpaceX anymore.

Imo it took him very long for that 11-fold. If I may believe some traders on this site they often do a double of triple in options per day. So in 3 days one can get there.

Isn’t it kind of “odd” that the manual exit is based on an external variable rather than something of the underlying? I mean, normally you could base an exit - somewhere between the spread and based on a solistic view of the trade - on e.g. some sort of optimized but robust point on a pdf curve...

Back in NIO (fwiw). (target 10.4), probable exit around 5.8 Probable fail :rolleyes:

You are wise and have a lot off experience:thumbsup:

I do think every adding, or averaging, or scaling in or out is basically a seperate 'trade'. Just like the sunk costs principle, it should be seen as seperate. And then we are back to "a crary", when correlation goes to zero, it can enhance your strategy, if it does.

A random-based exit will not become an edge-based entry

Honest, sincere and emphatic :thumbsup: