Search results

I think Europe already acted pretty quickly in this conflict. Yep, it did not take them long: There is not a whole lot that Europe can do Yep, Europe is impotent and spineless and everyone knows that. unless stability is reached through good diplomacy. Yeah, like Iran for example...

Oh but I agree, Russia will steal parts of Georgia (or perhaps the entire Georgia), it will then still the Crimea from Ukraine, perhaps the entire Ukraine, then it will take parts (or all) of the baltic states... Of course it will create provocations and false flag operations (remember the...

I'm simply making points and it is up to whoever reads it to decide The only point you actually made was to add three more differences between the wars to the four very significant differences I had compiled and then in a completely illogical manner declare that the wars were virtually...

it's hard to imagine because: -there never was an arab state in Palestine -the region was part of the Turkish and later British empire, it did not belonged to arabs -Most of the land was unpopulated desert -The jews migrated to the area in accordance with the law of the land at the time...

I don't think the differences are huge enough to dismiss the comparison. Who cares what you think? You are brainwashed, you believe every anti-Israel lie, you admitted that you want Israel to disappear. Who gives a shit about what you think, the differences are huge, Israel was shelled by...

The question is what the US will do. It's truly ironic that being Europeans you two are not even wondering what Europe will do. Especially given the fact that this shit is going on in your, not our backyard. I guess it's because you know the answer - spineless, impotent, politically-correct...

Point is, by condemning this Russian invasion of sovereign undisputed Georgian land, the Bush administration reveals its hypocrisy, as they supported the Israeli invasion of sovereign undisputed Lebanese land only two years ago. 1. Israel and Lebanon were technically in a state of war (since...

That's page 26 on http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/specialsession/A.HRC.3.2.pdf Page 26 says: "The conflict resulted in 1,191 deaths" UNICEF report says: IMPACT OF CONFLICT - Deaths - 1,187 (an estimated 1/3 of them children) What's so fucking hard to understand? Both...

Here is the original article that your wikipedia link is referring to (reference#11 in your wikipedia article): "More than 1,000 Lebanese civilians and combatants died during the summer war between Israel's army and Hezbollah guerrillas, according to tallies by government agencies...

Gringinho: "We still have to wait for full reports" but Gringinho: slaughter of an ethnic minority population Gringinho: Defending a ethnic minority population from being wiped out LOL, if this is your idea of consistency, I'd hate to read your inconsistent posts.

Right...You're smearing a country without any supporting evidence instead. Or how else should we interpret the following statement of yours: and this statement: You have no intellectual honesty to admit your mistake. In your last post you said "We still have to wait for full reports."...

You called Hezbollah "rogue militants" in your previous posts. If these rogue militants enjoy a great deal of support (and they do) those supporters are not innocent victims in the conflict by any stretch of imagination. You can't have it both ways buddy, if the Lebanese refuse to get rid of...

Of course you conveniently skipped the key phrase: "...published figures do not distinguish between civilians and Hezbollah combatants, including those released by the Lebanese government." And of course you lied and misquoted the article, it does not say: "Lebanese civilian casualties...

Look, I understand that you're down to your last and rather pathetic argument that Georgia attacked first but sorry, I am not biting. While it's debatable to begin with, more importantly it's completely irrelevant even if true. Georgia did not attack Russia, it "invaded" their own land and it...

LOL, and here is another Russian myth anti-american morons have fallen for: Human Rights Watch: Russia inflating casualty figures August 14 2008 Anna Neistat of Human Rights Watch, who is leading a team investigating the damage in South Ossetia, told the Guardian that Russian estimates of...

I was only holding the hypothetical possibility open - guesswork and maybes - of course it's just a quick analysis of what could hurt the US the most - and most effectively - for russians (or others). All your "hypothetical possibilities" boil down to some kind of completely unrealistic...

Something like Venezuela on board for the Sukhoi PAK-FA and then some. Who cares? Besides after little Georgia shot down between 10 and 30 Russian military planes (depending on who's counting) I don't think anyone is all that impressed. Last I heard the russian military technology is falling...

there is no way you can prevent them to go nuclear for civil purposes. That 's their legitimate right. Hmm, somehow no one, not even the UN and IAEA think that what the Iranians are doing is within their legitimate rights. It's also one can argue, their legitimate right to have nuclear...

The only thing the majority of the world accepts is that it was none of Russia's business and that their actions were illegal, immoral, aggressive and disgusting. Facts? This is an opinion of one misguided anonymous blogger. The fact is the experts and all russian neighbors disagree with your...

so - the russians initiated the conflict? Here you go again. Of course they did. It's a irrefutable fact that it was Georgia who attacked South Ossetia. 1. It is NOT irrefutable, at least Georgia is refuting it: Georgia, Tbilisi, 7 August /Trend News corr. N.Kirtskhalia/ Ossetian...