Search results

No we don't. Look, i don't believe in altruism or some universal moral code but the fact is OUR society is legally (and in every other aspect) built on our Constitution. We vote for politicians and they make laws, but they are also bound by law as to what they can or can't do (like seize...

it's not about whether or not they're 'doable'. It's about it being wrong in every way: legally, ethically, morally, philosophically and any other lly i missed. Seizing the assets of an ILLEGAL enterprise is not comparable to stealing the legally acquired assets of private individuals, that is...

you're correct sir, it's entertaining but sad in a way. oh well.. fuckem. :D

u should NEVER call anyone else crazy after starting this thread, retard. "yea let's steal other peoples money cause we deserve it." fucking old, tired, lame, wrong on every level mantra. just move to a commie country futurecunts, everyone wins. well except you, but you're too dumb to...

Got Proof? you act like just cause you post something, it's true. i am 99.99% certain that max is a legit trader, so im not sure what u think he is making up.

it's good times when bigarrow gets one round into an argument and says GFY. then claims he owned them. haha

what evidence have you seen of min wage helping the economy, this 'study'? lol. i don't want to keep typing the same shit, just ask yourself how raising costs on producers would be good for your business or the economy as a whole.

well if you think prices are going to stay the same and companies are going to hire more people at higher wages, then you think they are going to eat the cost themselves, and i know that's not going to happen. And if you think they're going to make up for this with volume, because the min...

1) i dunno, but the point is this attitude that because it's a small increase and won't effect many business's is the problem. These little cost increases add up over time, and like gwb was stating in his post, they do end up pricing out the smaller players and raise the barrier to entry. this...

true but their costs are all still going up equally. those that will employ fewer people or raise prices, or whatever.. are trying to keep their margins in line. just stating 'we'll eat the cost' is lazy and stupid, from the companies perspective.

i get how it works, but you wouldn't just say "we'll take the loss" BEFORE even seeing what your comp does, would you? I would vote to shit can a ceo that said that (and meant it).

right, regulations and govt mandates are a big part of the reason the economy has turned to suck, like in other socialist countries. but private companies set their own prices and they tend to pass new costs on to their customers, like good capitalists. this raises the cost of living in...

his competition has the same cost increase, i really doubt the whole industry will decide to take a hit on their margins. do u have a link?

I wonder what the BoD thinks about their ceo's plan to make them less money.. sounds like empty words or even just fabricated bs.

how come lefties can't understand this?

is it just coincidence that YOU are also a gay socialist? I doubt it.. methinks you aren't really an atheist but you try to emulate your mistaken version of jesus. be honest, you wear a WWJD bracelet, don't you?

the ad is fucking gay dudes. if you think the 20 something crowd is going to be influenced to buy obamacare by this, you're laughably mistaken. in fact the only thing that's gonna get them to buy in, is a much steeper <s>tax</s> penalty.. which i'm sure will come in the future.

probably the lamest ad i've ever seen. i wonder what this flaming loser got paid, courtesy of US taxpayers.

I agree as well. besides who else is there to argue with, futurecunts!? might as well just smash your head against a sharp corner, repeatedly. I don't think anyone should use ignore, but i laugh a bit when i see ON IGNORE!!!

it's a strange thing, me agreeing with stu, but they have the right to do it, just like a private wedding photographer has the right to deny his service to a gay couple*. Like you implied though, the stations are out to make money and if DD is a moneymaker (never heard of it) this is an...