Search results

Ok Walter - I'll leave this thread alone. If you remember - I defended you and your times from the start of you posting them. This is because I do something similar with times of my own, and I understand (understood) what your times represent. Now you are acting like I'm against you in...

Oh well, stop hit. Now what? :eek:

Normal time.

Which market? Most are normal time.

Well, I think walter said above to give or take 20 minutes. Now, using a 1 minute chart of NQ, I'd expect there to be a signal of some sort within 20 minutes of ANY TIME given. Using a 5 minute chart or NQ, the signals will be fewer and farther between. So giving a time where there is a...

There lies the rub. A "call" will only be proven correct at the exit - the the "calls" as we get them are only for the entry. If the "call" is intended to give only 1 or 2 NQ points, then you are right - they can't be that significant. I also assumed the times were supposed to be at...

Perhaps you can explain the criteria you are using to determine if a call is "correct" or "incorrect".

You are assuming the info is meaningful at all - IMO, it's not. Look at how much of the size gets pulled vs. actually traded.

So what is the default? We are assuming that 1256 contracts would fall into normal cap gains calculations - is that really the case?

TGregg - Thanks for the research. Great job.

The Conference Committee hasn't even been formed yet and it will be passed in the next 3 days? :eek:

Walther - Might I suggest that you simply start one thread and just continue that thread with each days times - instead of starting a new thread for each day? I think that would help everyone - and you won't have to keep explaining yourself over and over again.

I dont get what's so hard to understand about this - walt's explained it over and over again. The "times" are not a system. You are not supposed to do anything specific based on the times. He is suggesting that most system signals will work better at or close to the times he is giving. He...

I wasn't questioning the times - was just confused because you said the "NEXT" time was 14:35 - and you said that before the 12:15 time hit. Thus, the "NEXT" time was really 12:15, and you added 14:35. No problem. Just wasn't clear on what you were trying to say.

Does that mean that 12:15 was "cancelled"?

Who is pretending?

Theoretically, I guess. Doesn't make much sense to me - the premium you'll be paying (and losing) will be huge. You are probably better off just taking the hit on your futures position.

How? I don't understand. Can you give me an example of a single position (straddle if you wish) that would limit the risk of all these positions to a finite amount? 1. Long 1 ES and the market moves against you. 2. Short 1 ES and the market moves against you. 3. Flat and the market...