Search results

half

pity she isn't -- and never was or ever will be -- actually his. geez candle, what's a smart guy like you doing talking crap like that?

use it only for online purchases, and other matters of convenience, and always have it paid off. if they can't afford it without credit, they certainly cannot afford it with it... only the truest ignoramouses would take on creditcard debt to "buy things" they can't afford....

my god man! you're right! we're looking at $3000 minimum!

even better: i-burst wireless

one man's trash is another man's treasure, right nitro? i found shots aplenty...

oh nice one gekko! give the plot away why don't ya! :(

hehe that reminds of the theme song from Greatest American Hero... "believe it or not, i'm walkin on air...." great song

relax wappers :) personally, i don't think there are any concrete reasons to support either position -- i hold all morality as being subjective. i just thought it would be fun to see on what grounds people try to justify their decisions. well, i could quite easily say it IS a time...

personally, i'd prefer to see fewer from you, er...

i'll take that as a "i have no idea daniel, i just feel the two cases are different"....

yes please.

that's a nice solution freealways... let the indians go after iran... and, of course, that presupposes that they'll go through pakistan to get there...two birds with one stone.... or maybe we could meet them half way? kinda like the russians and americans at the end of ww2...

and i say we should hewer the dewer...

but why wappers? WHY is it the "right thing"? because it's what YOU like? the only reason we should accept the "right thing" is to kill the man because YOU like it? that's the best you can do? consider then, the following scenario: you're a surgeon and your specialty is organ...

if this, if that, if i had a magic wand... if if if, ..... the point is, you can't get in touch with him. you can't defer the decision to anyone else, and you can't blame anyone else for your decision. there's one decision for you to make: divert the train or not? now, decide. do...

ok, i see what you're saying. by surrendering or fighting on they were guaranteed to lose. the third option at least gave them a chance (however slim) of winning. there's a similar story (was that one true?) about a king in malta facing an attack from the turks. they don't have a lot...

{GROAN} Babak, they haven't gotten to you too have they? ps - stories like this give a really clear insight into why the vast majority in asia can barely afford a piece of bread, don't they...

"obviously"? it's not obvious to me... personally, i find it difficult to justify willing, purposely taking the man's life simply to divert an accident that is going to occur...

hitman is a part of ET lore! but, alas, it is not i... for my part, i'm much more inclined to believe you are mental defective who, for whatever reason, has his panties in a bunch over something i said.... get off the high horse buddy... you already have stooped to the same level...