Search results

Let the games begin.

Clutter. Some softwares, and probably this one, allow the "whozis likes this post" or "whozis thanks whatzis for this post". This eliminates extra posts which often serve only to lengthen the thread (and I'm NOT referring to Facebook "likes"). The advantage to this, particularly with regard to...

Are we supposed to be sad about that?

I don't know if "red flags" are really appropriate in hindsight. That's why I've been pointing out stuff in chat. As far as "recurring harmful patterns", I try to leave that stuff alone. There are tons of people who will jump in to offer advice, but it's usually better to let the trader go...

Sorry, game, I've forgotten your question. Do you mind repeating it?

http://www.1940sukradio.co.uk/

Actually it's about Market Profile, which used to be about the same thing more or less but then lost it's way due to marketing and products and vendors and general nonsense. The AMT stuff posted to the Ghost thread (160) is in line with what I've been talking about.

No excuse. :) Excellent observation on your second chart. You're making better observations with the flu than others who are perfectly healthy.

Incidentally, you may have noticed how extremely short the hourly bars have become (or how tight the "waves" inside those bars have become). This makes the price risk of exiting and re-entering almost trivial.

Remember that the line is in your head. Even though it's drawn to track the D/S balance, precision is not the order of the day. If you entered late, then, yes, I'd exit or scratch. Otherwise, I'd wait until the NY open to see what buyers do. According to AMT, you can expect a test of the...

It wouldn't matter unless price drops below 1240. Sideways may be what gold needs.

Looks like we're going to hit 30 after all. If so, I see no reason right now not to go back to the previous estimate of 60, or even the original estimate of 80. But the answer to the question of "who's in charge?" is pretty clear.

I was hoping you'd notice this. If you combine it with your daily chart, you'll see that if you can reach 1300, you'll have yourself a trend change.

I'm a little fuzzy on the details. You say you came up with a list of thirty-five stocks and ETFs and I assume this list resulted from your backtesting. Did you also forward-test this same list? If so, how did your results compare with the results of your backtest?

Well, we've passed 3610. 3630, anyone?

That was ten years ago :) BTW, the tennis racket thing was from Casino Royale. No one got it then, either.

I'm glad that you're continuing with this rather than making it just a one- or two-shot. But if you want to keep it together in a form that will enable people to follow what you're doing, I suggest you open up a journal as others have done.

Given the angle of the ascent and the fact that trend channels are diagonal (and their upper limits increase day by day) and so on, the upper limit of the long-term trend channel and the level of the last swing high are beginning to coincide. This provides an upside of 3610 to 3630, which is a...

Since there is so much essential information in the early part of this thread, and since it's not on the Hall of Fame list, and since no one has posted to it for five years, and since it's practically impossible to find unless one already knows where it is, I'm bumping it. Those who seek calm...

Sure: chat