Search results

Only if there's real money involved and I can enforce the wager against you when you lose.

Yes, I do wish to discuss them. But, I'm just amazed that all of your quotes, which you claim to have found off line in various books, can all be found at the following url: http://www.trueauthority.com/cvse/archaeopteryx.htm Good thing that this isn't a court, cause you would be in contempt.

I decline the invitation to be drawn into an insult match. Res Ipsa Loquitur

Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz: I support teaching of evolution in schools, as long as we also teach other unproved popular theories too. Really? Shall we teach alchemy, witchcraft, the four humors, astrology, numerology and the Gods of Egypt and Mt. Olympus in biology class, along with evolution...

Did you get those quotes on line or not?

Your opinion is unsupported by any factual evidence.

If you want to have a reasonable discussion, then cite the ACTUAL and complete source of your findings, not some vague partial quote. I don't hide where my info comes from, because I am interested in discovering the truth. If you are, then do not hide your sources. Otherwise, I must regard your...

Please cite the source publication and the url, if available.

Transitional fossil forms from reptile to bird, accounting for every major substantive physical change in bone structure: Eoraptor, Herrerasaurus, Ceratosaurus, Allosaurus, Compsognathus, Sinosauropteryx, Protarchaeopteryx, Caudipteryx, Velociraptor, Sinovenator, Beipiaosaurus...

Now that you mention it, Creationism had at least 3,000 years reigning as the absolute truth of existence, and yet it was unseated by one book, written by one minister, after he visted some islands and saw a few unusual animals. I'd say that is a pretty impressive shift of thinking for an...

You may be right. Time will tell.

Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz: Competing ideas? Where is there a competition to discover the truth? Aren't we really all on the same side in the search for truth? No, we’re not. The evolutionist’s truth and the creationist’s truth are two different things, because neither accepts what...

I would be intellectually dishonest not to acknowledge competing ideas, now wouldn't I? I read the debates between Spetner and Max, and while there are some moments that are difficult to follow, there are a few things which I do not swallow well at all. Spetner's comments are all...

Snore...

Well, it won't be coming from me. All good things must come to an end, and I need to go back to my day job real soon now, where I get to argue with people and get paid for it.

Definitions are nothing more than words constructed by humans to communicate information. Your position in the argument hinges on what YOU believe the correct definition of what a species is, and what evolution is. Yes, I am siding with the majority opinion, until such time as a minority...

Regardless, the "loss of information" argument is obviously used by intelligent design advocates as a means of discrediting evolutionary theory. Now that I HAVE read the argument, I can say, that I at least understand the issue somewhat. Furthermore, you have yet to show that the cited...

After wandering the web, I have come across the source of your argument, i.e., the debate between Dr. Lee Spetner and Dr. Edward Max. Why the hell, you seem to think that keeping your sources and argument a secret does anything to make you appear anything but deceitful is beyond me, but, maybe...

Another conclusion supported by nothing more than your own opinion. Blisteringly hot air.

1. Unless you cite an authoritative scientific source for your "unmet condition of evolution #1," then your definition is a personal one, as it is not shared by the scientific community. 2. You are concluding that the changes that occured in the cited experiment are the result of the loss of...