Search results

I think perhaps our President has bitten off a bit more than he can chew this time -- although I'm sure he means well (or, I hope he does). Under 50 U.S.C. 1802(a)(1)(b) the President may conduct a warrantless electronic surveillance if the U.S. Attorney General certifies in writing that...

Okey dokey. I'll do that.

Actually, it is your legal duty not to intentionally misrepresent or to permit others to knowingly rely on a material failure to disclose if your intention is for others to deterimentally rely on your failure. You admit above to knowing that others misunderstood you, and you failed to...

You're failure to disclose your true intent while allowing others to act in reliance on your statement, operates identically to fraud, no different then were you to offer to sell someone a car, and tell the buyer that "It runs just great," while holding back your knowledge fact that when the car...

It's real simple: either you were lying then, or you're lying now. Either you misrepresented your position before, because everyone took away from your statement that you intended "materialization from pure potentiality" to mean instantaneous appearance of Man on Earth from the Mind of God. Or...

Let's look at your original post in context, shall we: No reasonable person could miss the implications of your comment in context. You meant that Man appeared instantaneously out of the mind of God -- nothing less. You may wish to deny that now, several months later, but that just makes you...

Thanks for that. It was quite unexpected.

Awww, do we onwy have ow wittow name cawing to pwetect ow fagew ego? All you've got is blank spaces and insults -- no facts. Just the pewling whine of a little child, who can't have his way. As for me not being able to back up my statements: 1. The first post of this thread is proof of...

Z's version of the appearance of Man on Earth: "Materialization from pure potentiality." Z's opinion of the contrary, scientific view, that Man is the product of evolution: "Lunacy of the Darwinists." No reason for me to add my opinion to the above. Res Ipsa Loquitur.

Hmmm...a creature that maintains its basic instincts, while going through various taxonomic changes. By George, you may be on to something. Only a guitarist could have such inspired thoughts.

I have my settings on the site changed so that I can see the maximum number of posts per page (i.e., 40). So for me, this thread is only 5 pages long. This is actually a fairly typical end time. Z will entertain about three rebuttals based on the facts, before he decides to pull the plug via...

Don't try to reason with him. It just eggs him on. Better to simply talk around him, when he gets to where he is now, i.e., at the point where he's got nothing left except a personal attack intended to obfuscate the original premise of the thread and drive everyone away. Bottom line is that...

non responsive.

Non responsive.

Are you trying to annoy me in particular, or is it just something that you enjoy doing in general?

Only in your mind.

I do, but not routinely. I was totally flat Friday. Not because of any prescience, however. Ironically, the stocks that I routinely trade, were almost entirely unaffected by the overall market, so even if I had been playing the game, I probably would have had a profit. My experience with DIA...

The facts demonstrate to the contrary.

You must have been short DIA on Friday.

No, I asked whether or not that was his intent. Work on your reading comprehension.