Search results

Thank you for your response.... Is it probably correct that 98000 x .005 x 2 = $980 commissions were paid...and 4x $250 =$1000 were revenues earned....? Wouldn't it be better if you were paying .001 per share...thus keeping 80% of the profits? What you are saying is that you made...

Thank you for your response... In order for further clarification....it would be common for a supervised beginning trader to commence with approximately five or six 2000 lots...which would be approximately $100-120 in commissions per day or approximately $20,000 to $25,000 per year... What...

Exactly...in some of our work...we believe but cannot prove that mutual fund managers are mostly responsible for particular support/resistance points...however their game is always to win in the long run...and because of their size are always averaging the prices of companies they want to...

Obviously....a consistently profitable trader consistently maintains "the edge".....

What are the typical number of shares that both experienced and inexperienced trade per day in this strategy...secondly what is the highest and lowest commission rate paid by traders who are in this strategy.... What would be a typical annual commission total for this strategy as well as a...

You cannot consume without money....

Very interesting...but part of the problem here is that savers are not rewarded for their honest, hardworking ethics...This is very dangerous...There is a large and somewhat new "poor" in the USA that was counting on some interest from the $50,000 to $500,000 they had saved....But now $500,000...

It is the change in technology and the internet that enables the new brokerage model to exist... The model that lends itself more towards the customer being profitable is the model that will retain longevity...The musical chairs game is a matter of advertising to newcomers... A major...

It is the change in technology and the internet that enables the new brokerage model to exist... The model that lends itself more towards the customer being profitable is the model that will retain longevity...The musical chairs game is a matter of advertising to newcomers... A major...

Thank you for your excellent feedback....everyone will be informed as things progress....

There are no barriers to entry for existing firms...the more...the better... This does however call for firms to move away from the front end approach in terms of their profit motivation...

Profitable traders have an option to leverage their time by getting paid for instruction flow...for something that they are doing anyway.... This is also a volume/commission question at .001 debit versus volume at outside firm rates...

You feedback is appreciated !!!!!

Thank you for your responses... Again...there are no barriers to entry to this business model...however interested firms should be aware that .001 is the commission level in this model which includes the rebates... Models reflective of the standard .01 are ten times higher and are not...

Thank you for your responses.... As you all know...the industry has had the cart before the horse for a long time...Think of it this way...what percentage of your upfront capital was paid upfront before you made any money...? Example: An aspiring trader who goes to a training school pays...

.001...no mins....300 shares costs 30 cents.... This is the going rate for firms with volume with rebates...nothing unsual... Money is made from profits...not failures...the tuition pays the front end costs... People that fail have very small front end tuition costs....

What do you think the IPO price will be...then...and 6 months later... I smell a buyout...then snuff-out...

The profits are shared 85 % to the trader...15% to the company...afterall why would anybody want to be trading if they were not profitable... The company would be continually looking for people that have potential...and need what the company has to offer... The training is accomplished...

The point is...who's watching ex and current SEC, NASD employees who use the government employee background as their future big big revenue stream...in Corporate America... Legal is big money..big weird...can eliminate lots of good American entrepreneurs... We all know that this "winking...

The business model is moreless a talent filter...who's payout is similar to a hedge fund... There are no real barriers to entry...it is just that most firms of size would rather sell the "picks and shovels"...and will try to block this model to protect their models... Will post more...