Search results

Don't spread false science here. What you claim is clearly false. The information is available for far longer period than you can possibly imagine. If you don't know something, don't make it apparent to everyone.

Some of the questions can only be properly answer with appropriate scientific background knowledge. Most questions don't have a clear cut yes or no answer. Are you really interested? That will bore everyone to death. I'll try to answer the first two questions together because they are the...

How did I ignore them? Were they rhetorical questions?

These are very good questions. I don't think I can do justice to the answers but I'll try. 1. What is the correct average global temperature? Or. What year/time period average should we use to determine the correct temperature? Scientists have figured out pretty reliable ways to measure...

The hostility is because you constantly post long articles that people are not interested in reading. Just say what you think would be much more productive. Read what Tennekes said. The summary at the top of the webpage pretty well sums up what he said. I was mistaken to think the summary...

Do you post anything that you yourself understand? Or are you just parroting someone else's nonsense? Take a look at this link: http://climatesci.atmos.colostate.edu/2006/01/06/guest-weblog-reflections-of-a-climate-skeptic-henk-tennekes/ And note what Prof. Tennekes, your hero, says, If...

These comments betray an ignorance of how scientific research is conducted. High-profile scientific discoveries are always those that overthrow the prevailing consensus. A scientist would not go very far in his/her career if all he/she does is confirm what others said were correct. So the...

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/27/opinion/27doran.html?ex=1311652800&en=870956966cbf5101&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss

That's the key, isn't it. For those who do not submit to God, there will be no peace. Why shouldn't we be frightened?

It seems that you have trouble reading. I am not offended at all. It is simply curious that you can read either "hate" or "love' in my post, where the only place the word "hate" can be found is in the phrase "hate the sin." I apologize for my unsuccessful attempt at irony.

I see. "Religious people" are sacred and are not to be made fun of. OTOH, liberals, democrats, lefties, commies, moonbats are unpatriotic, hate America, and are Godless. By the way, when someone says that "liberals/democrats hate America," that's not attacking, that's simply stating a fact...

1. I don't hate religion or religious people, not even their actions or words, although I may interpret some of their words (such as "hate the sin") as hateful. 2. Where did you read "love the person" part in my post? I would never love someone the way some religious people would love others...

I only read hate from the phrases that contain the word "hate," as in "hate the sin ..."

Translation: "Bless you, JB, because you're going to hell!" Perfect proof! If you don't "hate" me, how can you read "hate" from my post?

"Bless your heart" --- All-purpose phrase that can mean many things, most of them bad. Especially handy when speaking to or about a nonbeliever. When the nonbeliever identifies him- or herself as a nonbeliever, you say, "Bless your heart." Which means, "Bless your heart, because you are going to...

Are you among the 34% of the population who still like Bush? http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1066034#post1066034

We would have an army ready to intervene if necessary.