Search results

fcuking LOL.

lol dude, you made me laugh and cough-up my Coke.

I have no idea, but suspect it will be revenue positive after a few years, although the windfall will be in the hospital sector.

How many nicks do you have, Mr. Gump? I've had those three, and none posted concurrently.

18,519. So you have 1.85x my posts, and I've been here over a year longer than you. Add the year and you have over 2x my posts. riskarb, atticus, drownpruf. They teach arithmetic in Appalachia? Must be a grad-school course.

We can bet on the outcome. It's a simple touch probability (or PI exp prob if you like).

Talk to the CBO. You stating it as fact doesn't make it factual. I do understand your point, but disagree. I believe that ACA will be revenue neutral within a few years.

You're a constructionist, who is ostensibly anti-slavery, yet has no issue with the fact that the writers were slave owners. Yet you use that decision by the Supremes (upholding slavery and leading to the CW) as an analogy to the current Supremes upholding Obamacare. Holy shit you're nuts. So...

TBH, I don't care what you or others think about my intellect, but if you knew my ed background you'd shit yourself with envy. I do find it comical that you allude to these PM conversations about my nick. Sounds reasonable to you? You think you let the cat out of the bag regarding my previous...

How about "Joe the Plumber?" More like Joe the welfare queen.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_reckoning/2012/10/25/blue_state_red_face_guess_who_benefits_more_from_your_taxes.html Truth hurts. And these are not major metros. The lie is that it's centralized in cities; cities in rural America, eh? Direct from Tax Foundation http://taxfoundation.org/staff...

Yahoo Finance called; they want their idiot back. GOOG will not see 1000 before 2016.

500 by tomorrow's close? Won't happen. My guess is that you'll monitor the prints and delay your out until it's moved against you, while using the hindsight print to call it a success. Like the time you were "trading" GOOG and you edited your long post to a short after they announced a miss.

Yeah, that's what I like to see, go big or go home!

It's sarcasm, and obv the ACA has no pre-existing condition exclusions, which relates to "aging-out" which is already covered by Medicare. omfg, really? It's about as likely as seeing mainland Siberia from Palin's yard. Is there anyone to converse with that doesn't have their head up their ass...

That's why the GOP is illegitimate; as they're the first to bitch about entitlements yet would go full-on militia if you try to take it (Medicare) away. Supposed hawks who fully realize that it's not sustainably-funded, but don't give a fuck. Same goes for welfare; predominate in the red-states.

Yeah, your comment is nonsensical; all of it is subsidized in one way or another. Either through poaching of the GRF or other means. It's certainly not covered by contributions. At least that's the appeal of the ADA -- that full coverage allows for sound underwriting.

I'm ok with Cruz strapping a bomb to his chest. I don't see it as much of a stretch. I brought up the Constitution and I'll hazard a guess that you would label yourself a strict-constructionist. So how do you feel knowing that your heroes (the majority of which) were slave-owners? I mean...

Yeah, I am ok with death panels, but it's absurd. Where are the DPs under Medicare? Do you understand the process involved in underwriting? I don't think you do. Ask ma and pa to give up their Medicare and see what they say. An anecdote. I have an uncle sitting on a $10MM pension and he friggin...

You're directly comparing Obamacare and slavery, in the sense that both were upheld by the Supremes. You Sir, are a fucking retard. And yes, I think you either suffered from fetal alcohol syndrome or did the damage yourself.