Search results

Who cares what 'research' shows, there are MANY ways to use indicators that are not "traditional", meaning not how they were intended to be used. Its certainly possible to take an indicator and figure out some way to make it work, doesnt mean it has to be anywhere close to the traditional...

Read it and weep, fuck face :cool: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=178254&perpage=6&pagenumber=206 Just so you know, I am not an old man which I believe is a prerequisite for you in order to 'stalk'. So you'll want to turn your attention elsewhere. :D This...

Actually, the science says that, according to their models, you can eat that much meat and it's not at all harmful....meaning not at all bad for your health. So you are wrong to argue total elimination.

If your argument is to eliminate meat altogether, you really shouldn't be using a source which doesn't agree with your premise :D

The bottom line is, if beef were actually as bad as you think it is, the guy would be saying to eliminate it COMPLETELY. Why not just say that??

actually he said 1-2 hamburgers a week does a body no harm, which is more hamburgers than I currently eat so actually this would have me INCREASING my hamburger consumption :D

But he didn't say to eliminate it altogether (give beef da boot), as you do :D So the answer lies somewhere in the middle

If beef is so bad for you, why didn't he say not to eat ANY AT ALL? :D

Will you at least answer your audience as to why you refuse to post an execution report, that which can be used (by us) to possibly help you stop blowing up your account?

I'm not admitting that, all I'm saying is that, by your own evidence, people DO NOT have to give 'beef the boot' completely. Some beef in the diet has no ill effects. In other words, does the body no harm if eaten in accordance to the 'models'. Also, since when do humans ONLY do things that...

There is no reason to give something up that one likes if eating a certain amount does no harm to the body. In the end, the argument centers around whether or not eating any is bad for you. Your evidence, according to the models, say that some is NOT harmful so no reason to give it up completely.

we have evidence (provided by you) which says that eating some meats does the body no harm. So giving it up completely is not necessary at all.

I've turned off my PM for now, because the Jack Hershey nut sniffer guy was flooding me with emails because I made one single comment about a Jack Hershey poll being skewed. The guy is whacked out of his skull!

To juggle of course :)

Not once in over 50 pages have you proven that you are really live trading. Saying you are up or down doesn't prove anything. Your word, yes YOUR word, is meaningless. Asking for advice or help, saying you definitely will start doing this or that and then doing the complete opposite for at...

what is your sample size?

Don't be sorry, it's not real. None of this is real. :)

8 pt range is not much movement

It really should not take this long to create a screen shot of your execution report for this mornings 'trades' :cool:

This poll is worthless, the crazy guy keeps coming back as a different person and voting. Poll is completely skewed. No point in trying to garner anything from it.