Search results

9-19 10:20 close of ?? If one were to annotate a lateral beginning with that bar - 11:50 close of on increasing black would be the first bar to close outside of that lateral and as such no pt3 yet ??

damn, they were suppose to be separate - now i have to go back and find them again:mad:

.

.

.

:D that's a "describing a ball park to a player" type of thing. This stuff goes way deeper:

I am afraid it's not that simple - nothing is what it seems: The difficulty many have results from their inability to differentiate what they believe they see from what the market has actually provided. A thing might look like a (insert whatever one has trouble with here), but isn't. The...

I don't know - for a while I've been nurturing a gnawing suspicion that there's more to gaussians than initially meets the eye. I think we're talking about being able to tell by the end of the bar. Period. Not the flaw type of philosophy - "may be, may be not, let's see the next bar PRV" And...

:D that's OK - we may get a VP who belongs to the church that practices religious healing. Now, who would even need a healthcare after all that - just go to Palin's church - they'll heal you.:D

Spydertrader, if you'd be so kind - could you tell whether or not the Gaussians are annotated correctly in the attached. Thank you.

:D I am more like a dog admiring a rainbow from afar: "Wow, I've seen it before!" And just like dogs couldn't tell you much about diffraction and interference - i can't tell you what the differences are between those two bars:D

:D count me in! EDIT: does the difference has anything to do with Gaussian sequences?

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2005172&highlight=flaw#post2005172

thanks, the last hour makes me want to take some dramamine :D

Does spike bar ( e.g. 13:40 [close of] ) represents change or continuation?

Isn't it?

You're absolutely right. All of the above refers to a preceise and well developed discipline of POM (public opinion manipulation). Public opinion only counts during the election time, as far as US goes, and that's when we get the Hollywood quality thrills. US used to be to Europe, what...

At the risk of sounding rhetorical, I will ask why do you think there is, or ever was a balance of wealth. The relationships in the world economy most closely resemble the game of tic-tac-toe. The game theory tells us if both parties (and for the sake of simplicity lets assume two parties...

If my previous assumption is correct - one can not apply jokari window logic in this context as well?

Apologies, my question was not phrased correctly. The Jokari Window has decreasing Volume after increasing Volume. That increasing Volume part has to increase over something. That something is a third bar. Does the above mean that one can not apply jokari window logic to the last bar...