Search results

i was in that same DAX trade- i was swearing at my screen! the real bitch is that i was long earlier when the DAX was leading down (got smoked when it jumped my stop limit), then, decided to play the drop i saw in the ES by shorting the DAX; only to watch the ES drop and DAX refuse to budge...

curious where your stop was (if any) and/or what your risk management was for the trade? i ask because, given your gains, that means you were underwater ~$25,000 @ one point. i'd have been shaken out; so i'm trying to learn how other people handle such circumstances successfully. congrats.

you do realize that you're starting a new thread about something that is 2 1/2 months old...

thanks, you made my night. fucking ET...

99% of the time when people on ET quote exact percentages, they actually pulled said % out of their ass in an attempt to sound smarter than they are.

if you look at my posts b4 you had to defend your indefensible thread starting/attention whore problem, i did not take issue with your content, only your clear attention problem. like a bitch, you shot back, ignoring the topic at hand- like a fucking 2 year old. you know i'm right, that's...

a twat would know about hurting/itchy vaginas... dolt: i did not say the thread had no value. my point, as you well know, was that you could accomplish same, and with MUCH greater credibility, with ONE thread. did you even read what i said? of course.... i know you understood what i said...

you're missing the point (or ignoring it). in a desperate grab for attention (or in doing your job for Baron... whatever), you start a million threads with the same premise. hence, actually turning off people who agree with you. start a thread titled something to the effect of 'we're all...

i agree with the premise of much of your ridiculous barrage of threads (how about you look less like a fanatical lunatic and just keep to one thread- or is Baron paying you by the thread?). that said, you are prone to sensationalism... just a tad. for instance, please explain to me the asian...

long a pantywaist 2 contracts @21.75. stops below LOD and 19.25. trade asia, but the setup suited my liking. frankly, a bit scared of one of those 6-10 pt whooshes. ehh, wtf, c how it goes...

forgot one- the new Camaro is a car that will not be sitting waiting to be sold. if they don't kill the rag top (it's rumoured to be a potential victim of cost cutting), i'll buy one when it comes out late this year/early next. Camaro is a piss in the ocean though, of course, in terms of GM.

that's the funniest shit i've read all week. i have him on ignore, so i can only imagine what he said. btw, you've got it nailed- post count is the ultimate barometer to use here on ET to flush out who the great traders are. you've found a great mentor kid.

nope. it's when C started to implode. after the C deal was made public, C actually traded up. then it started to fall. then it went into a death spiral to 1.22, with BAC along for the ride, followed by everyone else to a lesser extent. ES broke spt and the stops blew it to 729 in a heartbeat.

wrong.... to pander to congress and Obama, they'd have to drive hybrids to the border and then hitchhike the rest of the way.

so you're still long from 3812? if so, do you trade without stops? just curious given the point drop we had from your entry.

in the 600 vs 550 part, i was commenting on where real support was on the chart. i made no comment on ultimate low. my other comment was that S&P 130 is HIS 2013 ultimate tgt- i think THAT (130) is reality challenged. i don't disagree with your summary of the situation, it was 130 i had a...

that was beautiful- nice trade. i was going to post about taking some off teh table here, as 741 is the line in the sand. geesh, sure looks like it's gonna fall today, though...

could you explain where the blue line comes from in your chart- seems pretty random. 'if' it gets down that way, the chart dictates a spt @ 600, as the other poster said. btw, you're not really serious about your 130 2013 target, are you? i believe that's below tangible book value. kinda silly.

guess i wasn't the only one who saw the parallel. daily show just ran a skit showing Mr. Rogers and comparing to Jindal. not a fan of Stewart, as he reminds me of all the smug know-it-all liberals (who hold themselves in much higher regard than reality would indicate) in the bay area. still...

the problem, unfortunately, with bloomberg is that they could be interviewing the donkey from teh tijuana donkey show and, if there was serious breaking news, they'd still not break away from the interview, wouldn't run anything cross the bottom of the screen, would then go to commercial once...