Search results

  1. efficiency

    Countrywide: downgrade could be crushing

    Sisss, transferring credibility to yourself again. And disregarding WHERE the paper's going. There's ALWAYS someone on the other side of the trade. All lending institutions have percentage of delinquency. IF they don't, they're not making enough loans. The essence of...
  2. efficiency

    Triangles ect.

    Spot on. Same holds true for ILA. Both hinge on proxies. Just "lost" OCPI last week, During the latest market cycle, SBC Communications, Cox Commuinications, Sears, Nextel, Michaels Stores, Claires Stores, Georgia Pacific, Golden West, Webex, Damiler Chyrsler, and First Data have all POOF...
  3. efficiency

    Triangles ect.

    And, a more condensed view:
  4. efficiency

    Triangles ect.

    Yes those are nice charts. But what the reader(s) doesn't consider is all the charts I didn't show, the headfakes, false breakouts, surprise gaps, etc. Nor the fortitude to hold those nice charts like a bucking bronco. It only takes a few of those to make all the BS worthwhile. While...
  5. efficiency

    Is there an indicator for this?

    An averaged or smoothed candle isn't going to relate IT to the prior candle, meaning it disregards gaps. Gaps are meaningful manuevers of the specialist/market maker. This is why "we" have ATR. Incidently, ATR works well toward both position sizing and mental stops. Did I say mental...
  6. efficiency

    Triangles ect.

    Here's one that should eventually "do it's thing" We'll call that a 7 year base (and an ascending triangle) On a two year chart, it would......................look too high. Present ADX is 30. That's slight misnomer because ADX , via DI+ and DI- uses the incremental change from H1 to H2 (or...
  7. efficiency

    Triangles ect.

    One more "A" for the road. Hopefully you get the gist. Incidently the preceding are ELAPSED. No longer viable candidates, yet, you'll find the volume considerably higher (and the news better) than at the apex. Pssst, those are clues. "It's" all about the merchandising of paper.
  8. efficiency

    Triangles ect.

    Oops, back to the "A's"
  9. efficiency

    Triangles ect.

    Here's one I missed. Quite painful. The ADX, assuming a 14 day default, wouldn't have had you buying at $21. Once the ADX is above 40, it's not sustainable. Price trend however IS.
  10. efficiency

    Triangles ect.

    Not thru the "A's" yet, How 'bout this one?
  11. efficiency

    Triangles ect.

    This one has three:
  12. efficiency

    Triangles ect.

    Hmmm, maybe this one:
  13. efficiency

    Triangles ect.

    Perhaps this one:
  14. efficiency

    Triangles ect.

    Or this one: Familiar name. Not as "good" in percentage terms. Just a 3 bagger.
  15. efficiency

    Triangles ect.

    And this one:
  16. efficiency

    Triangles ect.

    Attached are some............eh............triangles. Nothing to do with 2 year charts.
  17. efficiency

    seeking true PPT information..read here..

    Sure there is, fuckhead. Nuthin' to do with conspiracy. Legislation enacted in March 1988. Performed in Chicago via futures. That would suggest liquid stocks, now wouldn't it? Arbs? Try the specialist and his inventory agenda............then black boxes following the CLUES. "They" say...
  18. efficiency

    Triangles ect.

    True Range is the greater distance of 1. Today's high to low 2. Today's high to yesterday's close, or 3. Yesterday's close to today's low. Thus incorporating a gap (if any). Gaps being synthetic price points established by the specialist/market maker. Average true range would be just that, a...
  19. efficiency

    Triangles ect.

    Triangles occur over a myriad of timeframes; decades, years, months, weeks, days, hours, minutes. You haven't specified. A narrowing average true range (ATR) probably can be graphically reflected as a triangle. A triangle must resolve. However, resolution can be a headfake. Breaks...
  20. efficiency

    ALL MAJOR USA investment banks...INSOLVENT RISK VERY HIGH

    YOU weren't around in 1929. Ditto for 1974. In 1987, YOU were what? A cub scout?
Back
Top