Search results

once you accept that nobody is actually out to get you while trading, you'll have a better perspective on everything.

as I said he quoted me 2 cents over my AMP rate which is likely the same as yours. Margins posted there are only for their app - not for any 3rd party. you will pay 10% of exchange initial rate per contract for margins. I don't care about that because I don't like to lever high. been there...

ok, now you're getting it. get in touch with Denise Shull. or get her intro level course. $500 when I bought it in 2018.

???????????????????????????? see my first two replies. you already know, you're just not doing it. can't help that. good luck.

what i'm saying is - you already know the answer... it's somewhere within your method/etc. you're just avoiding facing it and instead asking for random people who care way less about your trading than you do to give you some way of avoiding facing the truth you already know.

LOL *** it's just the result of you not exiting when you know you should have, then waiting, holding, hoping, praying, panicking, crying, and capitulating. nothing more.

I spoke with Adnan at AxiomaticAI today. he's the kind of guy whom after speaking for 2 minutes you know you're going to go with his work, but you listen to the other 8-10 minutes because he's that interesting. so, to summarize; AxiomaticAI is providing MT5 to Ironbeam as well as StoneX...

forget Johnny v. Amber, this is going to be the trial of the century!

perfect example of what I spoke of earlier: QT via AMP/CQG on the left. MT5 via AMP/CQG on the right. huge disparity.

Ironbeam quoted me like 2 cents extra, FWIW. margins will be 2x as high, but I don't care about that. call Mike Murphy, he was who I dealt with. don't blame you, switching platforms has been the bane of my existence for the last several months.

try downloading QT. you probably won't have any issues with automation - I think my programmer was just too new with their language. however, I do get the absolute pain in the ass that a full platform conversion is, so, yeah. for comparison, QT fills are 20ms all day long. MT5 ranges from...

I came back to write that their MT5 is lagging again the way I described. that's so unfortunate. yeah, that's the kind of response I got at first too. I opened QT and saw ES trade up to 3648 and MT5 was still at 3640 lol. sigh. I will let you know how Ironbeam's MT5 is.

the last thing I recall AMP telling me was something to the effect of - there is an MT5 server somewhere overseas that data has to go through before it gets back to Chicago. but then i think a day later that tune changed and they said everything was in the US. maybe try to get some clarity...

well, don't despair. I made A LOT of noise with AMP over the aforementioned lag issue - I'm talking full-on screaming at one of the tech guys on the phone. he couldn't even explain ping to me and he was in tech..... BUT the guy knew trading and we came to a resolution after several days. I...

TA is just a tool to measure mass psychology - of which tech, fundamental, everything - encompasses.

i use MT5 via AMP. I can't exactly tell what you're seeing in the 2nd set of images, but I see it in the first. CQG and Ninja will have slightly different data on tick based charts, but they should align as you said on time based. oh now I see on the 2nd set.... close price different by 1...

stomach bug returned, been out of commission all week. working on getting my tech issues resolved during the down time so perhaps can get to trading early next week.

long shot I know, but do you have any experience with AxiomaticAI? they connect a neutral MT5 connection to CQG claiming direct market access. I am unsure if this is CME Direct or not (my guess would be not).

yeah, that one made me spew. he didn't make a call there, rather criticized yours. odd that you would liken those posts to real time trade calls, but ignore the probably near hundreds of others he has made. regardless, please record this meetup so your integrity can never be refuted lol.