Search results

The logic goes, just because everyone believes something doesn't necessarily mean it's true. In this case, what the science community accepts as fact on an overwhelming majority basis just happens to be the truth.

So your standard of truth is how many people believe something? That's a logical fallacy. It really sounds kind of lame when you establish the end condition of a debate as being how many more quotes you or I can post. So you're only response to the substance of the quotes I posted are...

Were you offended by the "i.e. Pascal's Wager is for the gullible" comment? I can tone it down if you'd like for the sake of keeping this discussion civil. Betapig!? Lol, that's original ;)

Hello Murray. If I may ask, what is your point here in one or two sentences?

Great, another Federal Reserve conspiracy theory... What must they be doing here? It must be for the preparation of the coming Fourth Reich! FEMA has concentration camps for us all!

Ouch, let me run to mommy with that one.

Aww, did I lash out at your imaginary friend? I'm sorry :( Actually, no I'm not ;)

Utilizing the strategy I have detailed here, what would you employ as a risk management strategy? I see the double premium mental stop as a rule of thumb which could be far surpassed as you guys said. Black swan events are a given. How would you protect yourself?

The Creator pink elephant god demands total obedience or it's hell fire for the unbelievers. Those who heed the commandment are promised paradise in the after-life forever at the feet of the holy pink elephant. If you believe and you are right, it is paradise for you. If you believe and are...

Here is an update of that portfolio I posted earlier this week. FYI, Inception date was June 22, 2011. Profit is now at 3.113%, up from 1.725%. It seems like everything is working so far. http://www.betapeg.com/updated.jpg Any more comments, suggestions, or observations are welcome as long...

I know from your response you are a Grade F asshole.

Assumptions? Before you spout off more nonsense, read this. These are not assumptions but facts. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_common_descent "Evidence of common descent of living things has been discovered by scientists working in a variety of fields over many years. This...

Clearly, you see my quotes directly conflict with yours. Your assertion that "most if not all scientists accept" a fine-tuned universe is obviously untrue so you might want to back off such a baselessly arrogant statement. The physics clearly postulates the very real possibility of a random...

Tell me about it. Some people think they are god's gift to the human race.

You don't even know our structure. Piss off.

More quotes........ ========== In general relativity, spacetime can be empty of matter or radiation and still contain energy stored in its curvature. Uncaused, random quantum fluctuations in a flat, empty, featureless spacetime can produce local regions with positive or negative curvature...

Since you love to throw quotes around like they're one hundred dollar bills, here are some which state emphatically the universe probably came from nothing in random sequence and continues this random sequence on the quantum level and to some degree, even macro level (sand dune analogy)...

No, you're just throwing quotes that agree with your point of at me. Nothing more, nothing less. And now childishly calling me names. Really?? I read your quotes. I disagree. Deal with it. I did but your only response is to reject my reasoning out of hand as a "sound bite". What's funny...

I find it amusing that science can agree on one theory of evolution, one theory of the big bang, one quantum mechanics, one general relatively. But when it comes to god, there are thousands of religions, which can't agree on the same thing!! But of course, they have all the answers. :p

I'm sure you are atheist when it comes to a pink elephant orbiting the sun. Speaking of irrational beliefs, your certainty of no pink elephant orbiting the sun, ranks right up there too.