Search results

Statisticians (particularly medical epidemiologists) are famous for making something out of nothing by using %ages, e.g., "There was a 50% increase in mortality after ... blah, blah" = 1/1,000,000,000 to 1.5/1,000,000,000. While true, it's really not as dramatic as what it originally sounded...

Look, look!!! ES is printing a H&S with a spike in it pattern. lj

FWIW, I really like the Beelzebub's lawyer approach with no 'gift from Spyder EOD chart' being presumed, dare I say - predicted, but rather being anticipated. FWIWx2, there's lots of interesting stuff in those days surrounding Romanus' "dantheman" chart posting for those who might be interested...

An abbreviated yet expanded version of the AM blab which I screwed up due to lack of proper personal hygiene. And speaking of hygiene, poo-boy hasn't returned but if he does I'm ready with some mudd. The real reason why yesterday's "Just for fun here's another one" didn't work was that the...

However it's right here, somewhere: lj

Aha. A clue with the implication being that the aforementioned 'also' is not referring to the fact that the two other traverse change signals require 3 bars - not surprisingly. Regrettably I cannot supply conditions for the "aha" moment. lj

Not wishing to quibble but it is an acceleration albeit small and definitely not perceptible to the eye (at least to my eye). However one would be looking at the volume printouts, EOB. That said it would appear that I'll be joining the rest of you in a rectifiable state of ignorance vis à...

Therefore dV2-3/dt > dV1-2/dt and with dt fixed at 5 min, then (V3 - V2) > (V2 - V1) and unless I don't know what a slope acceleration is or unless something else is meant by 'slope acceleration' then I believe treeline is correct, 10,001 is >10,000. I'm still recovering from that brutal...

Gee ETF, coming from a BSD like you I'll just ask the mod to go ahead and shift it. I know you made a monster call yesterday and were whinging about the fact that you weren't truly being appreciated since you got moved to CC. I don't remember any particular pearls of wisdom (were there any...

Yah. The market rules and predictions don't. Why the failure of this little pearl? ES isn't GOOG is the obvious one but the correlation between high beta GOOG and volatile ES is quite high (r2 is 0.7-0.8). The dV override would be my pick and of course, it was Turnaround Tuesday...

Close. Inorganic biochemistry. As my sainted Irish mother would say, "If we were all wise men, dere'd be no fools". I prefer 'stupid people' to 'fools'. Having been in the position of being the former and having worked hard over the years to avoid that state [stupid to me = knowing that...

Partial quote: So then a (?quick) RTH lower low today for ES UNLESS ... please read prior posts. So, NOT a quick lower low but rather the 'UNLESS ...'. e.g., check the volume on the 5 min ES @ 10:05-10. the 15 min ES @ 10:00-15 and the 30 min ES @ 9:30-10:00 (cool). All > the discordant V...

Each AM I get up early and run this vidi clip to get my mind right for the day ahead: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8Nf1MK7lts&feature=related An Iranian I once knew (I say once because if he went back there he's probably dead - but I don't know) said I was like a Sergeant Major - not quite...

I don't consider it a waste of time to respond to someone who responded to something I said. Thank you for your interest and I do not see you to be meddling in any way. I still have lots of questions and welcome your thoughts. As I said earlier, for me anyway, it was your observation on...

Duckster, Sorry for the delay in responding to your post but I was in transit. You know, London –Zurich-Abu Dhabi-Zurich-…. Anyhows, it’s pretty clear you have an advanced degree or two, in what I don’t know, but maybe a few more questions might help me find out. But first the...

An assortment of EOD channels for the 15 min ES. Cool, like a striped iceberg. lj

Thank you Spyder for your comments. The casual observer (?Tums) would be wrong. As to my statement about there being no 'single path', I'll stand by that. I appreciate that this is not about nomenclature and said so above. The 'thing' (sounds like a bad sci-fi flick -and yes I can be a...

Not wanting to get too metaphysical, Spyder, I do appreciate that my hypothesis is not based in reality simply due to the fact that there were a number of bars (81-22 = 59) which followed after bar 22. If on the other hand you are saying that there could never be an end of day which looked...

You are entirely too sensitve Tums if you deem what I said to be a diatribe. As to whether it is nonsensical, well, that's a matter of opinion and you know what they say about opinions. I am well aware of the post to which you refer and understand it, I am sure, as well as you do. What I...

Thank you Spyder. I meant to add Lateral Movement to the 'missing annotation' collation and neglected to do so - a clerical oversight. I have no problem using the 'established' nomenclature. What I should have said in points 4 and 5 is that at bar 22 we are starting to build a channel and...