Search results

  1. N

    Let us now hear from the Creationists

    Wrong. I conclude that you have not demonstrated that the changes that occurred in the cited experiment are otherwise than the result of the loss of information. Therefore, "Unmet Condition of Evolution #1: A modification, beyond the mere loss of information due to mutation, in the...
  2. N

    Let us now hear from the Creationists

    Again, this discussion is not about my personal needs. "Unmet Condition of Evolution #1: A modification, beyond the mere loss of information due to mutation, in the genetic composition of a population resulting in a new species." It's ridiculous to suggest that the process of evolution...
  3. N

    Let us now hear from the Creationists

    Wrong. "Unmet Condition of Evolution #1: A modification, beyond the mere loss of information due to mutation, in the genetic composition of a population resulting in a new species." You have not show any evidence that the changes you cite are beyond those caused by the mere loss of...
  4. N

    Let us now hear from the Creationists

    Unmet Condition of Evolution #1: A modification, beyond the mere loss of information due to mutation, in the genetic composition of a population resulting in a new species.
  5. N

    Let us now hear from the Creationists

    Must you be so predictable? My satisfaction is not the purpose of the present discussion. The definitions I have already provided include those elements essential to the theory that you have up 'til now failed to prove. Any further elaboration is not required at this point. Mutation is...
  6. N

    Let us now hear from the Creationists

    Definitions and logic. Evolution: [partial definition] change in the genetic composition of a population resulting in a new species. Species: a taxonomic group whose members can interbreed. Speciation: the evolutionary formation of new species. Mutation is a necessary, but not a...
  7. N

    Let us now hear from the Creationists

    Wrong. "The inability to interbreed is a necessary, but not a sufficient, condition of a difference of species." and "Mutation is a necessary, but not a sufficient, condition of evolution." follow logically and inevitably from the terms they contain.
  8. N

    Let us now hear from the Creationists

    Definitions and logic. Species: a taxonomic group whose members can interbreed. Speciation: the evolutionary formation of new biological species The inability to interbreed is a necessary, but not a sufficient, condition of a difference of species. Mutation is a necessary, but not a...
  9. N

    Let us now hear from the Creationists

    This example and others like it are flawed because the inability to interbreed is a necessary, but not a sufficient, condition of a difference of species. Organisms within a species can be made mutually infertile by defective mutation. The mere introduction of defects does not create a new...
  10. N

    Let us now hear from the Creationists

    Everybody's branding nowadays! You left out the © symbol.
  11. N

    Let us now hear from the Creationists

    Do you consider yourself in a position to criticize the competence of a product's design without first obtaining a comprehension of the intent of the designer?
  12. N

    Let us now hear from the Creationists

    Only a foolish child would criticize the competence of a product's design without first understanding the full intent of the designer.
  13. N

    Let us now hear from the Creationists

    Is it an incorrect conclusion?
  14. N

    Let us now hear from the Creationists

    Since you are ignorant of what the original intent could have been, your evaluation of the product in terms of intelligent design is meaningless.
  15. N

    Going public with a system ruins it?

    The answer is quite simple. You want the majority of traders to be on the opposite side of the market when you are taking your position. Once you are in your position, you want the majority of traders to move over to your side of the market.
  16. N

    Going public with a system ruins it?

    Of course, it's a relative matter. The more liquid your market, the greater tolerance your system will have for multiple users.
  17. N

    Going public with a system ruins it?

    Systematization: Input (market data) .... System (processing of data) .... Output ("buy", "sell", etc.)
  18. N

    Going public with a system ruins it?

    Just because many of the TA systems for sale are fraudulent doesn't mean it's impossible for any TA system for sale to be profitable. A correct statement of the value of a system's exclusiveness would be, "The greater the number of users of a given system, the more difficult it is to respond...
  19. N

    Going public with a system ruins it?

    Can you prove that negative statement?
  20. N

    Scalping and Analysing your trades

    You can work on your system by recording all included parameters of the market when you get into a position. Afterwards, depending on which way the market goes, you'll either have a confirmation or a contradiction of your hypothesis. The format of the record follows from the type of...
Back
Top