Search results

Here's why. First, all the pinheads calling this a "freedom of speech" issue are clueless. Despite what the First Amendment says, you can't say any fucking thing you want to. If you don't believe me, go yell "FIRE!" in a crowded theater, or go verbally threaten violence to the President or...

Maybe you shouldn't expose your stupidity by acting like you understand American politics. The neocons HERE are righties. That's why they are in the Republican Party. Your little delusional conspiracy that a bunch of radical "lefties" highjacked the conservative party HERE IN AMERICA without...

Once a neocon, always a neocon. I'm a little surprised that he said "I made a 'mistake'" (yeah, the 'mistake' of thinking he could get away with his bullshit at the WB the way he did in DC). The usual gutless righty dodge is "mistakes were made."

Dickhead Cheney is a pathological liar. Given a choice between lying and telling the truth, he will opt for the lie nine times out of ten, even on minor stuff, much less something big like the reason why he and the chimp took us into a criminal invasion and occupation of a sovereign nation...

Whoa! You watch HEROES but you think Hiro is Chinese??? :eek: It's scary to think about the implications of that revelation. ObThread: I wouldn't be caught dead watching AI but I'd love to have that Sanjaya punk win so I could watch the news footage of Simon Cowell's head exploding. :D :D :D

For starters, I see no difference between his points #3 and #4. Just two different names for getting out of a trade.

Man, the revisionists here fall all over themselves trying to disavow their own. For the record, the word "neocon" means "new CONservative", as opposed to the "old conservatives" who wanted a more isolationist foreign policy. There is no "lefty" basis to wars of pre-emption other than in your...

Some mouthbreather from Georgia. He thought it was REAL IMPORTANT to get the Wilsons' political affiliations on the record. :p

Stupid cunt Vicki Toensing: Dana Priest's Meet Victoria Toensing Live Chat (20Feb2007) New York: "Ms. Toensing, if no government official is willing to discuss Plame's job or covert/classified status how can you state with certainty that she wasn't covert? Has any government official told...

I'll believe Newt is not a hypocrite when he has the balls to say out loud "Don't pardon Libby." Of course that's a radioactive topic that he doesn't have the balls to go near.

As usual, you are WRONG. Among the SwiftBoat Liars for Bush, there was exactly ONE who served with Kerry. Everybody else who served with Kerry said KERRY WAS TELLING THE TRUTH. Most of the so-called "Swiftboat" vets had never even seen a swiftboat before the 2004 campaign. One was a USAF...

I fail to see Coulter's "humor." Presumably the "joke" is that Edwards is a "pretty boy" and therefore somehow automatically suspected of being gay. Weird. Elvis Presley in his glory years and George Clooney, both looking a lot better than John Edwards, have never even been hinted at as...

No story. Shit-tosser Mann Coulter (hell yes, it looks like a tranny!) "decided" that Hillary must be a lesbian for not divorcing Bill on the spot when he got caught lying about Monica. Apparently in the Coulter "mindset", if I may apply that term however inappropriately, a "real woman"...

Utterly meaningless. Poker has exactly calculable odds. Trading doesn't. That's why most traders have no idea how to apply optimal position sizing (which is also zero RoR, btw) to trading. Ask your **far "smarter"** poker players to do it for trading, and see how fast they fold. :D :D

RoR only applies when you use an absolute position-sizing method, not a less-than-100% fractional position-sizing method. Use the latter and your RoR worries are over. :cool:

Money management is not a trading strategy, money management is a component of trading strategy. And trust me, there are secrets out there. If you're merely saying that there's always someone else who has figured out what a given trader has struggled to figure out and to keep to himself...

Thanks for posting your performance. Best of luck with your system. :)

If you have sufficient degrees of freedom in your backtests, there is no curve fitting. Explain that to them.

No offense but I really don't have time to wade through umpteen hundred pages to see if a strategy is worthwhile, especially when so many people who have done that wading are left publicly scratching their heads. Yours may be an exception but generally when there's that much smoke and no...

For starters, how about just giving us a complete and clear backtest of your strategy? Then I can decide if I want to go any further. Thanks. Here's an example of what I'm looking for: