Search results

slide 2 of 5...

Back to understanding "Cycle 1"... The main difficulties so far are: 1. Navigating through the flow chart. Where should I be? Where should I or could I go next? 2. Perceived freedom of choices. Sometimes there seem to be two or more "correct answers". Jack's choice is different from...

Sorry, didn't read this before I looked at your second log. The funny thing is: Even though I misplaced N, N+1 and N+2 by one bar I ended yesterday at the same node for bar 1, at "F"! Today I look again and see something different. Here is where it comes from: 1. You say: "the day...

Hi Jack, in this document there might be another typo. MADA # 19 and 20 are the same but there is no instruction for node "S". Please have a look. Thanks.

Hi Jack, before I could even start trying to fill out my own log one thing immediately jumped into my eyes from your log: Your first bar is immediately in node "F"!? Sorry, but I probably misunderstood something. If I follow the flow chart and instructions then I start at Node "A" where I...

And this is "n+2". Jack, in your log you have "L" already at bar 1 and for bar two you have a "S - L". That is probably because you did this in realtime I suppose. You also marked "Lock in" next to hold. But that would mean "J" territory or did you mean something different with that note?

Here is "n+1"

I'm trying to understand the "Cycle 1 flow chart" by trying to reproduce what Jack did in his October 15th log. Already starting from the first entry questions come up. Please see enclosed image. Jack, bar 81 you marked "through" under "Wait, hold...". Was that a mental note for when you...

Hi Jack, quick verification... In this sentence: "...We do NOT connect which ends of EACH pair of bars..." Did you mean to use the word "each" instead of "which"? Thanks

Not sure I understand what you mean. Are you telling me: "Don't wast your time with that log and instead construct the three fractals on the chart?" Thanks for clarification.

Hi Jack, one of the important parts in your trading seems to be "log". Numerous times(years) you try to get people to create a log and enter "this" or "that". But so far success seems limited. Neoxx seems to have been the only one who used one and who publicly posted it. To be honest: so...

Hi Jack, "...treat internals as one bar.... and fan....". In this example it doesn't seem to apply. Three bars creating a stich and a sym. Now I can see that there are exceptions which creates the question: When should I and when shouldn't I use that rule? Thanks.

An alternative view... two ff + one TF... But maybe it's wrong.

Hi Jack, I just saw your annotation of dkm's chart which reminded me again of my question number 5 (please see below). From your charts it seems that once a volume sequence ends (B2B2R2B or R2R2B2R) then always immediately the another one begins. However from what I have seen so far...

Try this one: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896645.aspx

A similar situation today in the FDAX. At first volume and fractals/channels/containers/etc. seem to be in sync but then...

Beautiful! I know why I always enjoy to see your charts. Thanks!

Hi TIKI, I have some questions. See attached...

Hi dkm, I see your issue and I think if I had tried to trade that part of the day I would also have accumulated a big loss because of the green bookmark. My loss would probably be even bigger because at bar 45 I would have seen the FTT of your orange TF. Then bar 46 would be pt 2 of my new...

charts, thanks for taking the time and effort to reply! While I can see what you mean on the first lateral I'm not too sure about the second one. Based on what I understand (which is maybe not what you mean) if I extend the second lateral really that far and if I remember what you say...