Search results

I like how you try to dodge the question. Again: What new technology did they develop for this leak?

BP moves up $1 at 15:40 Don't see why this would require them to nuke - all they need to do is produce the well to take the pressure off.

Uh, what new tech development are you talking about? They removed the top of the old of the well that had the broken pipe. Then they bolted down a new top section which was mated to a series of valves. There was no new technology developed for this.

Where do you think the analysts get their estimate numbers from? Its not like they have direct access to the company's books. The company provides the analysts "guidance" so its easy for them to be conservative so that they can beat the analysts estimates.

That's not going to make for an exciting movie. May have to apply some artistic license when this is filmed and compress those millions of years down to a couple of days. :)

And besides, only "70 percent of terrestrial vertebrate species becoming extinct" during that event and that was before we had iPads so I'm sure as a species we will have a much higher survival rate than creatures 250 million years ago.

Boy are you in for some serious disappointment.

Agreed, why is it that many of the factual statements in the article have no cites: "Methane is now streaming through the porous, rocky seabed at an accelerated rate and gushing from the borehole of the first relief well. The EPA is on record that Rig #1 is releasing methane, benzene...

Xeon = Intel Processor Xenon = Noble Gas At this level you should know this.

I think the rumors about selling assets and Exxon requesting permission to bid on a BP takeover are pushing shares as much as the good progress on the cap replacement. From what I've read, once the cap is on they are going to try to shut the valves and see if it can hold. If so then the leak...

That's the second time you said you were done with this forum. Oh that's right, you've already admitted you're a liar so its all making perfect sense now.

Still trying to come to grip with that statement. What does not having overnight positions have to do with taking profits out of the account monthly versus compounding gains by leaving some (or all) of the profits in the account?

Since when? Meaning which, if any, of these returns are based on actual trading results and not SIM: 2005 = 39%, 2006 = 110%, 2007 = 145%, 2008 = 220%, 2009 = 450%.

Here, let me fix that for you: They know handing out billions of unemployment benefits makes for a great return in the polls in November I agree with the other poster, if they get such a great return on each dollar spent they should give twice as much money to each unemployed person -...

You didn't state if these were real profits or paper/sim profits. From a post you made on another site, I would guess the latter:

The first thing you need to know is database is one word.

Its also my understanding that the GOP would support a straight bill to extend unemployment benefits but dems refused to do that - they only offered a bill with other spending attached which the GOP didnt want to do unless offsetting cuts were made. So if the dems were really concerned...

Is there a DEM conspiracy to artificially prop up the economy right before the fall congressional elections with stimulus spending?

1042 broke a couple of minutes after you wrote this.

Wow