Search results

hear about chinese bullet train? there's a reason they are cheap

it is probably a better thing if the ceiling is not raised else there is no commitment to fiscal responsibility

aren't they all doing the same thing? defaulting without trying to look like they are through monetization, at least Iceland do u in the front, the rest try to do u in the back

hahaha, thats funny, guess they figured if there's no terrorists they can't justify the war on terror expenses

the only conclusive reason for all this scare tactic is for the banks to make another huge bet and profit

spike or not spike, u have to have balls of steel to be willing to risk being the last one holding the bucket

:D the hole theory

$ falling, to get rid of your $, buy stocks

yes, it has to monetization because the fed doesn't sit on such a huge amount to begin with, neither will any entity just hold that kind of amount idle at any point in time, else there is no evidence the fed release that kind of funds from elsewhere causing a crash somewhere else, at that time...

sort of like saying you maxed out 11 credit cards and the only way out is to have the banks increase your card limits !!!

did u get info from somewhere?

isn't that exactly whats happening now, special interests buying of the politicians, stupppp.....iiiii......dddd !!!!

considering that wealth distribution is like 90 95% concentrated in the hands of 5% sort of, to think there are people that plans gov't policies try to think of more ways to screw the poor, its just revolting. true, there r some poor that abuse the system but exactly how much can they scrap out...

i remembered clearly in june of 2008 just before the SHTF, our commodities portfolios in Canada and Australia which is substantial took a nosedive and went -ve together with all other global portfolios, now if there is no QE, even Canadian markets will be showing -ve returns, contrary to the...

they ought to default, even Russia done it and look they back

ok say look at the banking sector, a lot of the fundamental analysis are questionable since the accounting for trading books are based on fictitious figures, hell even Berkshire does that, who knows how many other large corps are doing it, so if u can't trust fundamental analysis and now you say...

someone should rate this US ratings agencies

u have to have a crack at it to understand why, multitude of reasons

:D :D :D

since the 2 systems must confirm each other at some point then they must be correlated to a certain degree, unless their correlation is at exactly zero then your combined system will never ever trade